Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Zstd Content-Encoding

Thank you for reaching out, Mihai and Peter! Our plan is to support this feature in WebView as well, but most likely a few milestones after M117 so that we can deal with any compatibility issues separately. I'll share further updates when we have more information on the WebView rollout plan.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: deliveryType (Resource Timing)

LGTM3 On 6/27/23 12:57 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:25 PM Rick Byers wrote: Note since the TAG and standards position requests were new on this, API owners were waiting a bit to hear if there was any feedback. But it's been two weeks now and this seems

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RFC 7616 Digest auth: Support SHA-256, SHA-512-256 and user hashing

Not an expert in our HTTP auth code overall, but I don't see any metrics for specifically digest auth vs. other HTTP auth types either. As an upper bound, I wouldn't expect HTTP auth of any form to be common. This whole space is mostly a legacy feature as far as the web is concerned. I doubt

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove Web SQL

Thanks for the update, no concerns with the change! BTW, I've added WebSQL as the #1 example case around "ease of adaptation " in our blink compat principles. I tried to briefly summarize

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: X25519Kyber768 key encapsulation for TLS

This is a TLS-stack launch, not a Blink launch, so it will take the following (estimated) shape: - Beta in 115 - Experiment deployment to 1% Stable in 116 once the enterprise policy is available. We will send an Intent to Experiment prior to this, based on the results from Beta. -

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: X25519Kyber768 key encapsulation for TLS

Contact emailsdadr...@google.com Explainer https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tls-westerbaan-xyber768d00-02.html Specification https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tls-westerbaan-xyber768d00-02.html Summary Protect current Chrome TLS traffic against future quantum cryptanalysis by

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove Web SQL

Hi blink owners, With request from partners, we are planning to update the timeline to enable deprecation trial from M117 (previously M118) to provide a larger window to integrate with the trial before full removal in M119. The rest of the timeline will stay the same. NEW - Target timeline:

[blink-dev] PSA: a heads-up re the Speech API on the Mac

The current implementation of the Speech API on the Mac uses the NSSpeechSynthesizer API for the platform voices. That is a deprecated API, and one of its particular weaknesses is having an absolute fixed rate on the synthesizer rather than relative rates. What that means practically is that the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: contain-intrinsic-size: auto none support

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:44 PM Vladimir Levin wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:16 PM Yoav Weiss > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:35 PM Vladimir Levin wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 1:12 PM Vladimir Levin >>> wrote: >>> Thank you for your feedback. My

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: contain-intrinsic-size: auto none support

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:16 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:35 PM Vladimir Levin wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 1:12 PM Vladimir Levin wrote: >> >>> Thank you for your feedback. My responses are inline below >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:24 AM Yoav Weiss

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API

I wanted to comment on this intent with my spec mentor hat on. I reviewed this specification and provided feedback to its authors. My main point of feedback was around its layering and how it relates to the other 2 specifications (Shared Storage and Protected Audience) that use the infrastructure

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: contain-intrinsic-size: auto none support

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:35 PM Vladimir Levin wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 1:12 PM Vladimir Levin wrote: > >> Thank you for your feedback. My responses are inline below >> >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:24 AM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:19 PM 'Vladimir

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API

There's clearly a lot of interop risk around all the different proposals in this space. At the same time, it's clear this is one of the most important aspects to the ads industry and so the huge amount of collaborative experimentation and open sharing of information on pros/cons seems net

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebRTC RTP header extension control

LGTM3 On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 8:56 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:15 PM Rick Byers wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> >> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 9:10 AM 'Philipp Hancke' via blink-dev < >> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> Contact emails >>> >>> h...@google.com,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: deliveryType (Resource Timing)

LGTM2 On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:25 PM Rick Byers wrote: > Note since the TAG and standards position requests were new on this, API > owners were waiting a bit to hear if there was any feedback. But it's been > two weeks now and this seems like a valuable and minor extension to me and > I trust

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebRTC RTP header extension control

LGTM2 On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:15 PM Rick Byers wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 9:10 AM 'Philipp Hancke' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> h...@google.com, h...@google.com, phan...@microsoft.com (sticking to my >> already subscribed email for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RFC 7616 Digest auth: Support SHA-256, SHA-512-256 and user hashing

Hi Rick, thanks for your response. I've files a WebKit issue: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/212 as for metrics, i don't have any. we have a 2-year old comment from ericlaw@microsoft that usage is extremely

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: contain-intrinsic-size: auto none support

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 1:12 PM Vladimir Levin wrote: > Thank you for your feedback. My responses are inline below > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:24 AM Yoav Weiss > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:19 PM 'Vladimir Levin' via blink-dev < >> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>>

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Storage Access API with Prompts

Contact emails cfred...@chromium.org, johann...@chromium.org, shuu...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/cfredric/chrome-storage-access-api https://github.com/privacycg/storage-access/blob/main/README.md Specification https://privacycg.github.io/storage-access Summary The Storage

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: deliveryType (Resource Timing)

Note since the TAG and standards position requests were new on this, API owners were waiting a bit to hear if there was any feedback. But it's been two weeks now and this seems like a valuable and minor extension to me and I trust the team to engage constructively with any feedback in this area

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebRTC RTP header extension control

LGTM1 On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 9:10 AM 'Philipp Hancke' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emails > > h...@google.com, h...@google.com, phan...@microsoft.com (sticking to my > already subscribed email for sending) > > Explainer > > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Remove Payment Request User Activation Requirement

This makes good sense to me. Obviously there's so much risk and potential for abuse around payments, getting the user to click seems like a very weak mitigation anyway (eg. the prevalence of "click to read more" buttons). +1 to waiting for the PR to land, but it looks like the WG has now approved

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RFC 7616 Digest auth: Support SHA-256, SHA-512-256 and user hashing

Hi Deomid, Thanks for the contribution! Do you know if chromium has any metrics on how common digest auth is? I took a quick look and didn't find one myself. +David Benjamin also. Technically all new APIs (which includes protocols) require a killswitch flag

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Zstd Content-Encoding

Will the zstd content-encoding be supported in WebView as well from 117? It wouldn't be ideal to be in a similar situation as with the Brotli ("br") content-encoding support that was not enabled in WebView from the start. On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Zstd Content-Encoding

Thank you for sharing the I2P Nidhi! What are your plans regarding supporting this feature in Android WebView? We're just rolling out support for Brotli there and we should aim for it to be on par with the browser regarding supported compression algorithms. Thanks, Peter On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API

A few words with my spec-mentor hat on: * I reviewed the specification, and I believe it is well-integrated with other web platform specifications. * There's one case where I think the algorithm can be more precise , but I wouldn't

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Topics API

LGTM1 to ship On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 9:50 PM Josh Karlin wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 3:27 PM Rick Byers wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 4:48 PM Josh Karlin wrote: >> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:05 PM Rick Byers wrote: >>> Thanks for the added color! With

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Restrict "private network requests" for subresources from public websites to secure contexts.

LGTM to extend the deprecation trail M117-M119 On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 11:03 AM 'Yifan Luo' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hey all, > > I would like to clarify that the current deprecation trial ends on M116 so > that I would like to extend it to M119. > > best, > Yifan > > On

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Restrict "private network requests" for subresources from public websites to secure contexts.

Hey all, I would like to clarify that the current deprecation trial ends on M116 so that I would like to extend it to M119. best, Yifan On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 3:38:15 PM UTC+2 Yifan Luo wrote: > Contact emailstit...@chromium.org, cl...@chromium.org, mk...@chromium.org > ,

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS text-wrap: pretty

Thank you Thomas for further feedback. I agree that CSS frameworks can apply this property better as they know which class has headlines/body for articles better. I look forward to it to happen too! On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 8:18 PM Thomas Steiner wrote: > Thank you for the very detailed answer,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS text-wrap: pretty

On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 12:59 PM fantasai wrote: > >> Avoiding a short single word on the last line (typographic orphans) is > one > of the most visible advantages of the paragraph-level algorithm. > > What does it mean to “avoid a short single word” in quantitative terms > (and > across

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: FileSystemHandle.getCloudIdentifiers()

On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 3:28 PM 'Alexander Hendrich' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hello blink-dev team, > For now, we are looking to prototype (and later launch) the new web API ( > FileSystemHandle.getCloudIdentifiers() > )