Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: Deprecate unload event

On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 at 07:23, Brandon Heenan wrote: > Still, previous breaking changes to the unload event that affected SAP > were present in the /deprecated page, so the safest thing to do is to > follow the same pattern here, no? > The switch landed here , It's in

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: Deprecate unload event

[BCC blink-dev, we can add them back when we have something concrete] On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 at 16:42, Robert Knight wrote: > > Robert, in your case could you use the permission policy to re-enable > unload events on the frame until we come up with a better fix? Or are there > scenarios where you l

[blink-dev] PSA: Ads Relevance and Measurement APIs ramping up

We have begun the ramp up of all Ads Relevance and Measurement APIs, and you can expect to see traffic levels increase over the next few days. We will monitor metrics and evaluate when to proceed to the next phase of the roll-out. Users need to relaunch Chrome before version updates or incremental

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype & Ship: Cookie Expires/Max-Age attribute upper limit for prior storage

It's true we don't have a lot of data on the impact of this specifically, but part of that is due to 400 day lag between enforcement and anyone in prod feeling the effects. We could try to produce data on the amount of cookies already in the store that would be newly capped, but that won't really t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Back/forward cache NotRestoredReasons API

Sounds good, I will create a list on the explainer for the "may block" reasons then. Re: exposing NotRestoredReasons interface instead of object in idl: I'm working on the implementation in this CL

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS cap and rcap font units

LGTM3. On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 11:30 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2023-08-04 16:38, Mike Taylor wrote: > > LGTM1 > On 8/4/23 6:41 AM, Daniil Sakhapov wrote: > > Contact emails sakha...@chromium.org > > Explainer Two font units related to the cap-height of the font. They are

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Make URL parser to not decode percent-encoded ASCII character in URL's path

LGTM1. It seems to have very low risk. On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 4:53 PM Hayato Ito wrote: > Contact emailshay...@chromium.org > > Specificationhttps://url.spec.whatwg.org/ > > Summary > > Make URL parser to not decode percent-encoded ASCII characters in URL's > path, such as "%41" ('A'). Before

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to extend experiment: WebAssembly Garbage Collection (WasmGC), plus stringref

Hi, folks! Here is a bit of feedback from the Kotlin team (JetBrains). We have been working on compiling kotlin to WebAssembly for a few years. The current implementation depends on Wasm GC and Exception Handling proposals. For now, it shows good performance and outperforms our JS implementati

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS logical flow relative values

LGTM3. On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 12:46 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2023-08-09 00:37, PhistucK wrote: > > They chose "open issues in our Github repo for each point of feedback" as > the result of the review and the mentioned issue was filed, with a > resolution to compute the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: Deprecate unload event

That makes sense—I suppose a more general wording that would apply here would be "These flags prevent or revert a breaking change and will only be available for a limited time." Does that sound better to you / others on the thread? On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 4:33 AM Fergal Daly wrote: > On Wed, 9 A