Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Read Chrome device attributes

2023-08-11 Thread 'Sergii Bykov' via blink-dev
Hello colleagues, As discussed, I added images to the explainer with examples from ChromeOS of how a managed app and a managed setting look like. Sergii On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 1:39 AM Reilly Grant wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:57 AM Sergii Bykov wrote: > >> Hello Reilly, colleagues,

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype & Ship: Cookie Expires/Max-Age attribute upper limit for prior storage

2023-08-11 Thread Ari Chivukula
I have no objections to delaying until M119. I'll check back in a week or two after the September 6 cliff when cookies in stable that were limited to 400 days as of M104 start expiring. It's important to note we will only be able to discuss the presence of lack of bug reports from sites and users

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: Deprecate unload event

2023-08-11 Thread 'Brandon Heenan' via blink-dev
Created crbug/1472321 to track that improvement On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 1:28 AM Fergal Daly wrote: > On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 at 09:08, Brandon Heenan wrote: > >> That makes sense—I suppose a more general wording that would apply here >> would be "These flags prevent or revert a breaking change and

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Make URL parser to not decode percent-encoded ASCII character in URL's path

2023-08-11 Thread Mike Taylor
I'm having a hard time assessing the risk, despite the very low usage (it has doubled since the original email was sent - but still very low) and other browsers shipping it. That said, LGTM2 % having a base::Feature we can use as a killswitch, in case we discover something we didn't

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate: Remove "Sanitizer API MVP"

2023-08-11 Thread 'Daniel Vogelheim' via blink-dev
Hi Alex, On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 8:13 PM Alex Russell wrote: > Hey Daniel, > > Hrm, this isn't how things are supposed to work. > > The API OWNERS set a high bar to ship exactly to prevent this sort of > bikeshedding after shipping. Is it possible to make compatible additions > instead? > I

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype & Ship: Cookie Expires/Max-Age attribute upper limit for prior storage

2023-08-11 Thread Mike Taylor
Perhaps we could delay this change until M119 as I understand that the first cookies that were set more than 400 days ago are due to expire in the M118 window. That should give us some time to understand the impact in more concrete terms and mitigate some of the impact, were it to turn out to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: WebRTC encoded transform - Modify Metadata functions

2023-08-11 Thread Mike Taylor
LGTM to experiment from 118 to 123 inclusive. On 8/11/23 9:07 AM, Guido Urdaneta wrote: Contact emails h...@chromium.org, agpa...@chromium.org, topr...@chromium.org, gui...@chromium.org Explainer

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: WebRTC encoded transform - Modify Metadata functions

2023-08-11 Thread Guido Urdaneta
Contact emails h...@chromium.org, agpa...@chromium.org, topr...@chromium.org, gui...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/palak8669/webrtc-encoded-transform/blob/create-encoded-explainer/create-encoded-explainer.md Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Opaque Response Blocking (ORB, aka CORB++) v0.2

2023-08-11 Thread 'Daniel Vogelheim' via blink-dev
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:29 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 6:48 PM Daniel Vogelheim > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 9:10 AM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 7:27 PM Daniel Vogelheim >>> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 5:55 PM Yoav Weiss

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: Deprecate unload event

2023-08-11 Thread 'Fergal Daly' via blink-dev
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 at 09:08, Brandon Heenan wrote: > That makes sense—I suppose a more general wording that would apply here > would be "These flags prevent or revert a breaking change and will only be > available for a limited time." Does that sound better to you / others on > the thread? >