Just to chime in here. If there's a chance this API is going to be removed
or even heavily changed its potentially worth making an effort to take down
any documentation regarding it to try to prevent any chance of its usage
going up. For example the mdn page on it seems an easy one to remove.
Currently, we haven't confirmed the public plan for user-agent reduction on
WeView. We won't do user-agent reduction before completing roll-out
user-agent client hints.
Victor
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 5:13 PM Bhanu Vattikonda wrote:
> Is there a corresponding User-Agent reduction plan for
Is there a corresponding User-Agent reduction plan for Android WebView?
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 12:30:17 PM UTC-7 vict...@chromium.org wrote:
> Contact emails
>
> vict...@chromium.org, mike...@chromium.org
>
> Explainer
>
> https://github.com/WICG/client-hints-infrastructure#readme
>
>
>
Contact emails
victor...@chromium.org, miketa...@chromium.org
Explainer
https://github.com/WICG/client-hints-infrastructure#readme
https://github.com/WICG/ua-client-hints#explainer-reducing-user-agent-granularity
Specification
https://wicg.github.io/ua-client-hints/
Summary
User-agent
Sorry for the slow reply; was OOO for a few days.
A lot of this is concerning. It's bad for us to be taking such deprecations
on-board when the I2S was executed in good-faith, and arguemnts like those
from Freddy are wholly unconvincing. This is a cost to Chromium to
accomodate a new API
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 2:39 AM Mike Taylor wrote:
> That sounds fine to me. Side question: would it be possible to treat
> shadowroot as a legacy alias of shadowrootmode, in case usage doesn't go
> down?
>
Yes, I believe that would likely be web compatible. The difference in
behavior between
That sounds fine to me. Side question: would it be possible to treat
shadowroot as a legacy alias of shadowrootmode, in case usage doesn't go
down?
On 8/14/23 7:09 PM, Mason Freed wrote:
I'm checking back in on this deprecation thread. In the intervening 5
milestones, the use counter for the
