Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Japanese Phrase Line Breaking

2023-09-13 Thread Koji Ishii
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:14 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > If there is feedback on the TAG review or Mozilla issue while this feature > is on its way to stable, can you loop back to this thread? > Yes, I will. Thank you all. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Japanese Phrase Line Breaking

2023-09-13 Thread Mike Taylor
LGTM3 On 9/13/23 5:46 PM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-09-13 17:14, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1 If there is feedback on the TAG review or Mozilla issue while this feature is on its way to stable, can you loop back to this thread? On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 4:01 PM Philip Jä

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: WebAssembly JS String Builtins

2023-09-13 Thread Daniel Bratell
LGTM for an origin trial M119-M124 (which I think is what you requested) Good luck with your data collection! /Daniel On 2023-09-13 18:04, 'Emanuel Ziegler' via blink-dev wrote: Hi Daniel, This feature has no impact without the Wasm moduled specifically compiled for it. So we are dependent o

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain on stable

2023-09-13 Thread 'W. James MacLean' via blink-dev
Perhaps try this: 1) open a new tab page (or about:blank if you prefer) 2) right-click and select "Inspect" at the bottom of the popup menu 3) in the DevTools menu at the top, click "Network" 4) then check the "Preserve Logs" checkbox in the row under that menu 5) finally, manually type the url for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain on stable

2023-09-13 Thread Madanagopal Damodharan
An update on the issue I am facing: We have a static html in web server called signon.html. Users access this static html page first which has a refresh directive with content=1. As soon as the user invokes this html page first time from the origin, this redirects to a login form page. This res

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: WebAssembly JS String Builtins

2023-09-13 Thread 'Emanuel Ziegler' via blink-dev
Hi Daniel, This feature has no impact without the Wasm moduled specifically compiled for it. So we are dependent on partners implementing this and measuring the impact. We have concrete plans with Google Sheets to run A/B trials based on an origin trial, but hope that other partners like Kotlin or

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Payment handler minimal header UX

2023-09-13 Thread Stephen Mcgruer
Thanks Mike! We were following through on the I2S process because we did an I2E for this feature as a way to let folks verify that the UX change wouldn't cause regressions. I still think that is correct as follow-through, but we could probably have made it clearer than we hope this I2S will be a r

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Payment handler minimal header UX

2023-09-13 Thread Daniel Bratell
LGTM2 (Also not sure you need this approval, but you can have mine as well) /Daniel On 2023-09-13 16:46, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM1 (I'm not sure you need our approvals to ship this UX change, but you can have mine). On 9/8/23 7:09 PM, Rouslan Solomakhin wrote: *Contact emails *nbur...@chrom

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: WebAssembly JS String Builtins

2023-09-13 Thread Daniel Bratell
Do you plan to run it as a finch experiment or do you have partners prepared for an Origin Trial? /Daniel On 2023-09-12 21:24, 'Emanuel Ziegler' via blink-dev wrote: Dear API Owners, Many use cases for WasmGC require calling JS functions or WebAPIs frequently. These

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Japanese Phrase Line Breaking

2023-09-13 Thread Daniel Bratell
LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-09-13 17:14, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1 If there is feedback on the TAG review or Mozilla issue while this feature is on its way to stable, can you loop back to this thread? On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 4:01 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: Thanks for investigating an

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype & Ship: Cookie Expires/Max-Age attribute upper limit for prior storage

2023-09-13 Thread Daniel Bratell
LGTM1 There will be some day late in 2024, early in 2025 that will be the death of many cookies. I now believe the risk of that being a problem is low enough. /Daniel On 2023-09-13 13:12, Ari Chivukula wrote: Re-opening this since it's been a month and we're a week after the September 6th c

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Japanese Phrase Line Breaking

2023-09-13 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
LGTM1 If there is feedback on the TAG review or Mozilla issue while this feature is on its way to stable, can you loop back to this thread? On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 4:01 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > Thanks for investigating and fixing the failures, Koji! > > On the UA defined rules, if other ven

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Payment handler minimal header UX

2023-09-13 Thread Mike Taylor
LGTM1 (I'm not sure you need our approvals to ship this UX change, but you can have mine). On 9/8/23 7:09 PM, Rouslan Solomakhin wrote: *Contact emails *nbur...@chromium.org *Explainer* https://crbug.com/1385136 - see comment 14 for screenshot *Specification* Not applicable *Design docs* (Go

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype & Ship: Cookie Expires/Max-Age attribute upper limit for prior storage

2023-09-13 Thread Ari Chivukula
Re-opening this since it's been a month and we're a week after the September 6th cliff where cookies in stable that were limited to 400 days as of M104 start expiring (if they were not subsequently renewed). I haven't seen any negative feedback or questions around unexpected cookie expirations in