LGTM for a deprecation trial from M120 to M132. For those of you who
have followed my career (all 2 of you), it shouldn't come as a surprise
that I appreciate the desire and efforts to minimize the compat
implications for sites that are earnestly moving towards this brave new
post-3rd-party
Contact emailsstei...@chromium.org, liber...@chromium.org
ExplainerNone
Specificationhttps://github.com/WICG/document-picture-in-picture/pull/104
Summary
This adds a user gesture requirement for the resizeBy() and resizeTo()
Window APIs for document picture-in-picture windows. This allows
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:40 AM Daniel Vogelheim
wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:33 AM Jeremy Roman
> wrote:
>
>> (3) Currently developers can only specify speculation rules using inline
>> script tags. The proposed feature provides an alternative through the
>>
Contact emails
johann...@chromium.org, wanderv...@chromium.org
Explainer
None
Specification
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-12#name-the-cookie-header-field
Summary
We intend to deprecate and remove default access to third-party (aka
cross-site) cookies as
Hi Jeremy,
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:33 AM Jeremy Roman wrote:
> (3) Currently developers can only specify speculation rules using inline
> script tags. The proposed feature provides an alternative through the
> "Speculation-Rules" header. Its value must be a URL to a text resource with
>
Thanks. LGTM to extend 3 more milestones (I believe M121 to M123 inclusive).
On 11/17/23 4:17 AM, Noam Rosenthal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:28 AM Mike Taylor
wrote:
Hi Noam,
Ack on the OT bugs (been there...); could you comment on any
substantial progress in the
SAP does fully support your intentions to get more webpages making use of
the *Back/Forward Cache (BFCache)*, because it is indeed a feature, which
is improving user experience a lot. Still, we do see at least two risks
associated with the current plan of storing also pages served with HTTP
Thanks for the feedback from developers.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 5:39:27 PM UTC+1 michae...@zoom.us wrote:
Zoom is interested in this as well - it is critical for us to understand
where in our audio pipeline that frames have been dropped.
Would this be supported for audio tracks in
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:28 AM Mike Taylor wrote:
> Hi Noam,
>
> Ack on the OT bugs (been there...); could you comment on any substantial
> progress in the following areas:
>
>- Draft spec (early draft is ok, but must be spec-like and associated
>with the appropriate standardization
