We decided not to ship `ruby-base` at this time due to an interoperability
concern.
We'll reconsider it while looking at the status of WebKit.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:11 AM TAMURA, Kent wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 12:53 AM Rick Byers wrote:
>
>> Hey Kent,
>> To Fantasai's point, can
Seems trivial to me, just one little question:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 10:34 AM 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev <
blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
> Contact emails
>
> fbeauf...@google.com, cwal...@google.com
>
> Explainer
>
> https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/4342
>
> Specification
>
>
>
Contact emails
fbeauf...@google.com, cwal...@google.com
Explainer
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/4342
Specification
https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/#abstract-opdef-validating-gpuprogrammablestage
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/pull/4387
Summary
WebGPU now allows developers to
LGTM1 assuming there aren't any surprises on that front. Thanks!!
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 2:33 PM Dominik Röttsches wrote:
> Hi Yoav,
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 6:46 PM Yoav Weiss wrote:
>
>> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8922#issuecomment-1720930646
>> indicates that some parts
Hi Yoav,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 6:46 PM Yoav Weiss wrote:
> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8922#issuecomment-1720930646
> indicates that some parts of this were resolved and other parts are still
> to be bikeshedded.
>
> Can you expand on that? What's the issue around color space
LGTM1
These all seem like useful improvements! :)
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:14 PM Jeremy Roman wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:10 AM Yoav Weiss
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:33 AM Jeremy Roman
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Note: This intent email spans three Chromestatus entries
It's great to see a bug with so many stars (now 100!) being addressed.
Thanks for filing the TAG review at
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/918 too!
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 2:19 PM Morten Stenshorne
wrote:
> Contact emailsmsten...@chromium.org
>
>
