Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Deprecate Third-Party Cookies

Hi Blink API owners, We would like to request your approval for adding a first-party version of this Deprecation Trial. This will be helpful for top-level origins that also need additional transition time, in cases where it is impossible, impractical or unnecessary to sign the affected third-

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Deprecate Third-Party Cookies

LGTM On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 8:11 AM 'Joshua Hood' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Blink API owners, > > We would like to request your approval for adding a first-party version of > this Deprecation Trial. This will be helpful for top-level origins that > also need additional

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate & Remove: Third-Party Cookies

Hi Adam, Just FYI, we are in the process of setting up a first-party deprecation trial (applicable to non-advertising usecases only) as you requested. Please see this thread for details. K On Thursday, Decem

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

Thanks Luke! Now that WebKit is shipping, can I get approval to implement and ship :state(foo) alongside :--foo, then deprecate and remove :--foo? On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Luke wrote: > Fwiw CustomStateSets with the :state() syntax is now enabled by default on > WebKit trunk. > https://g

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

LGTM1 to ship. On Tue, Dec 26, 2023, 10:10 AM Joey Arhar wrote: > Thanks Luke! > Now that WebKit is shipping, can I get approval to implement and ship > :state(foo) alongside :--foo, then deprecate and remove :--foo? > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Luke wrote: > >> Fwiw CustomStateSets wit