Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Document-Isolation-Policy

This is very interesting! Do I understand correctly and the main reason this would be easier to deploy is because embedded iframes and popups won't need to deploy COEP in this model? On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM Camille Lamy wrote: > Yes the user agent keying is deterministic, and we're addi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Removal of X-Requested-With in WebView

Thank you all for the LGTMs Sincerely, [image: Google Logo] Peter Birk Pakkenberg Software Engineer pb...@chromium.org On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 19:58, Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM3 > On 4/4/24 10:24 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > > LGTM2 to continue the Deprecation Trial until M138. > > Thanks fo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Stepped Value Functions

LGTM1 Thanks for catching us up here! On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:53 PM Daniil Sakhapov wrote: > Contact emailssakha...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-values/#round-func > > Summary > > The stepped-value functions, round(), mod(), and rem(), all transf

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Stepped Value Functions

Can you please flip on the "debuggability" review bit in chromestatus? (feel free to mark it as "N/A" if you think that's the case) On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:40 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > LGTM1 > > Thanks for catching us up here! > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:53 PM Daniil Sakhapov > wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM Button Mode API and Use Other Account API

Hi Yoav, Thanks for the suggestion! We have a flowchart in that thread to try to explain what a browser would do in case a user is not logged in to the IdP but maybe it's not very clear. The answer to your ques

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement and Ship: OpusEncoderConfig `signal` and `application` parameters

LGTM1 On 4/4/24 2:29 PM, 'Thomas Guilbert' via blink-dev wrote: The last launch gate approval came in today. Thanks! On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 11:49 AM Thomas Guilbert wrote: I agree that this would have been a viable solution, and this was considered and discussed with the spec edito

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Split up large trusted signals fetches & deprectedReplaceInURN via auction config

LGTM1 On 4/3/24 11:05 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: Thanks, that clarifies a bit and calms my worries considerably. /Daniel On 2024-03-29 14:27, Paul Jensen wrote: Daniel, I hear your concerns, but I should clarify that this splitting up of large requests does not do any reassembly or combining

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Stepped Value Functions

LGTM2 On 4/8/24 10:41 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: Can you please flip on the "debuggability" review bit in chromestatus? (feel free to mark it as "N/A" if you think that's the case) On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:40 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 Thanks for catching us up he

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Split up large trusted signals fetches & deprectedReplaceInURN via auction config

LGTM2 On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 5:36 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM1 > On 4/3/24 11:05 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: > > Thanks, that clarifies a bit and calms my worries considerably. > > /Daniel > On 2024-03-29 14:27, Paul Jensen wrote: > > Daniel, I hear your concerns, but I should clarify that this s

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

Hi Russ, Could you summarize progress on the following, per the extension process: Draft spec (early draft is ok, but must be spec-like and associated with the appropriate standardization venue, or WICG) TAG review bit.ly/blink-signals requests Outreach for feedback from the spec community WPT

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Document-Isolation-Policy

There is a huge demand for protecting data that's shared with users Any help in strong binding data to origin and blocking sharing would a big win. thx ..Tom (mobile) On Mon, Apr 8, 2024, 1:20 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > This is very interesting! > > Do I understand correctly and the mai

[blink-dev] Re: PSA: Protected Audience k-Anonymity Enforcement

FYI: We are planning to ramp k-anonymity enforcement back up to 50% of eligible traffic on Beta channel later today. Best, --Benjamin "Russ" Hamilton On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 1:25 PM Russ Hamilton wrote: > Recently, we became aware that Chrome was mistakenly applying k-anonymity > enforcement on

Re: [blink-dev] Intent for Reverse Origin Trial: Media Previews opt-out

Hello, any more information or context I can provide to move this forward? On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 11:21 AM mark a. foltz wrote: > Yes, the intention is to allow coordination of experimentation with > another origin trial for Page-Embedded Permissions Controls. I am CCing > +Chris > Harrelson

Re: [blink-dev] Intent for Reverse Origin Trial: Media Previews opt-out

LGTM to reverse-experiment. On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 2:35 PM mark a. foltz wrote: > Hello, any more information or context I can provide to move this forward? > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 11:21 AM mark a. foltz wrote: > >> Yes, the intention is to allow coordination of experimentation with >> anoth

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM Button Mode API and Use Other Account API

That's indeed very useful to get a better understanding of the overall flow, thanks! :) On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 5:06 PM Yi Gu wrote: > Hi Yoav, > > Thanks for the suggestion! We have a flowchart > > in that th