Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

LGTM2 Please make sure that use of the old syntax triggers some kind of developer-facing warning, so that it won't be too hard to catch the cause for the behavior change in the few sites that will be affected. On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:33 PM Joey Arhar wrote: > > How should I interpret the

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS pages with Cache-control: no-store and Back/Forward Cache

Hi everyone, We want to share a quick update that the CCNS experiment has been rolled out to 5% in stable. Thanks, Mingyu On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 4:53 PM Mingyu Lei wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We have landed the change that will clear the fallback surface if a CCNS > page is stored in BFCache,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature: Prevent Coalescing of Headers

Thanks for being flexible on this in response to feedback! On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 5:08 AM Anthony Garant wrote: > After getting feedback, we decided to no longer pursue this feature. We > appreciate the input. > > Thanks, > Anthony > > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:13 AM Domenic Denicola > wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: The ServiceWorker static routing API not condition support

2024年5月28日(火) 0:21 Vladimir Levin : > > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 3:43 AM Yoshisato Yanagisawa < > yyanagis...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> yyanagis...@chromium.org >> >> Explainer >> >> https://github.com/WICG/service-worker-static-routing-api >> >> Specification >> >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

Sounds good, thanks Tab! -- Emilio On Tue, May 28, 2024, 22:47 Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 1:04 PM 'Emilio Cobos Álvarez' via blink-dev > wrote: > > Has this been reviewed by the CSSWG? (not only the PR I mean, but the > > feature as a whole). The spec PR: > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecation of non-standard declarative shadow DOM serialization

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:30 PM Mason Freed wrote: > > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 8:15 AM Vladimir Levin > wrote: > >> Interoperability and Compatibility >>> >>> The use counter for getInnerHTML() ( >>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/3874) >>> peaked at 0.05% of

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 1:04 PM 'Emilio Cobos Álvarez' via blink-dev wrote: > Has this been reviewed by the CSSWG? (not only the PR I mean, but the > feature as a whole). The spec PR: > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/9515 > > Doesn't mention any issue or discussion in a CSSWG call.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

> How should I interpret the results from your investigation? That none of the 8 investigated sites would be negatively affected? There is only one site which is actually affected: https://resolv.com.br/ The buttons in the carousel there won't light up anymore, but they will still work. I made

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting Feature: Prevent Coalescing of Headers

After getting feedback, we decided to no longer pursue this feature. We appreciate the input. Thanks, Anthony On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:13 AM Domenic Denicola wrote: > This feature seems problematic from a web architecture point of view. I > have added a comment on >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Third-party Cookie Grace Period Opt-Out

LGTM3 On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:55 PM Ben Kelly wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:59 AM Vladimir Levin > wrote: > >> Hey Anton, >> >> Can you please request reviews for the various chips >> [image: chips.png] >> > > Done. Thanks. > > > >> >> Thanks! >> Vlad >> >> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Keyboard-focusable scroll containers Opt Out

LGTM to experiment from 127 to 133 inclusive On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:54 PM Di Zhang wrote: > Thanks Mike. Your explanation makes sense and we are good with 6 > milestones to start. > We expect the deprecation trial period to be longer to give web users > enough time to adjust, but can

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Third-party Cookie Grace Period Opt-Out

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:59 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: > Hey Anton, > > Can you please request reviews for the various chips > [image: chips.png] > Done. Thanks. > > Thanks! > Vlad > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 3:09 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < > yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> LGTM2 >> >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Keyboard-focusable scroll containers Opt Out

Thanks Mike. Your explanation makes sense and we are good with 6 milestones to start. We expect the deprecation trial period to be longer to give web users enough time to adjust, but can request a renewal when the time comes. I have updated the Origin Trial period to start on 127 and end on

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecation of non-standard declarative shadow DOM serialization

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 8:15 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: > Interoperability and Compatibility >> >> The use counter for getInnerHTML() ( >> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/3874) >> peaked at 0.05% of page loads using this function as of January 2024, and >> dropped

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: No-Vary-Search Hint for Prerender Speculation Rules

Thanks Liviu! -Caleb On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:49 AM Liviu Tinta wrote: > Hi Caleb, > > Your request will be addressed as part of nav-speculation#319 > . > > Thank you, > Liviu > On Friday, May 17, 2024 at 4:51:53 PM UTC-4 Caleb Raitto

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Third-party Cookie Grace Period Opt-Out

Hey Anton, Can you please request reviews for the various chips [image: chips.png] Thanks! Vlad On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 3:09 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 5:53 PM Anton Maliev wrote: > >> I see the concern. The 3P can use

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: No-Vary-Search Hint for Prerender Speculation Rules

Hi Caleb, Your request will be addressed as part of nav-speculation#319 . Thank you, Liviu On Friday, May 17, 2024 at 4:51:53 PM UTC-4 Caleb Raitto wrote: > I noticed the spec, >

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Timing information for ServiceWorker Static routing API

Please make sure that this new timing info abide by the Web Platform Security Guildeline: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD/docs/security/web-platform-security-guidelines.md#timer-resolution On Monday, May 20, 2024 at 12:00:26 PM UTC+1 Keita Suzuki wrote: > Contact emails >

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Compression Dictionary Transport

Contact emails h...@chromium.org, pmee...@chromium.org, yoavwe...@chromium.org, kenjibah...@chromium.org, denom...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/compression-dictionary-transport Specification https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-compression-dictionary/