Maybe it would make more sense to identify OWNERS who are not active
globally in chrome/, instead of owners not active in a particular
directory? How common are OWNERS active in Chrome, but high latency only
for specific directories? I'm asking as someone who was recently inundated
by auto-ge
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:29 AM Ali Juma wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:07 AM Kentaro Hara wrote:
>
>> Thanks all for the input!
>>
>> Dana:
>>
>>> This list includes per-file owners, did the script look for 100 CLs in
>>> those files named by the rule when deciding to remove the person
Contact emailsmme...@google.com
ExplainerNone
Specificationhttps://url.spec.whatwg.org/
Summary
Most hostnames that aren't valid IPv4 addresses, but end in numbers are
treated as valid, and looked up via DNS (e.g., http://foo.127.1/). Per the
Public Suffix List spec, the eTLD+1 of the hostname
Aug 18, 2021 at 11:18 PM Matt Menke wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 4:53 PM Yoav Weiss
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:47 PM 'Matt Menke' via blink-dev <
>>
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 5:23 PM Yoav Weiss wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:18 PM Matt Menke wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 4:53 PM Yoav Weiss
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:47 PM 'Matt Menke'
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 4:53 PM Yoav Weiss wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:47 PM 'Matt Menke' via blink-dev <
> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Contact emailsmme...@google.com
>>
>> ExplainerNone
>>
>> Specificationhttps:/
n, and
>>>>> assume I'd need to do a "Draft Intent to Ship email" before shipping to
>>>>> stable, after a 50% trial on prerelease channels.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There's no need for 2 emails for removals. We ca
gt;>>> +Jason Robbins - on the title issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I used the "Draft Intent to Deprecate and Remove email" button, and
>>>>>>> assume I&#
>>>>>>> something that has to be resolved via a search path.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:33 PM Yoav Weiss
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>&
ng that has to be resolved via a search path.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:33 PM Yoav Weiss
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>&
mes
>>>>>>>>>> that start with a digit (Unicode bidi afficandoes will know why)
>>>>>>>>>> - The only real reason why leading digits aren't outlawed in
>>>>>>>>>> domain names at the second level is 3com.
gt;> It seems safe to say that no legitimate fully qualified hostname
>>>>>>>>> will ever have a last component consisting only of digits.
>>>>>>>>> That means the only time we could get a legitimate hostname is for
>>>>
t;> anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if those two bugs (or "archaic features") occur together,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the result may be a successful resolution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
Skimming over the explainer, I can't determine whether this leaks data
cross-site or not. Are these digital products that the API manages exposed
across sites, restricted to same-origin frame, restricted to same-origin 1P
contexts, or what?
On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 3:37:18 AM UTC-4 Glen R
All intent emails - including experiment, are reviewed for potential
privacy and security issues. If this is keyed on frame origin, delegating
to cross-origin iframes is a cross-site tracking vector. If cross-origin
iframes have access to it, but keyed on top frame origin rather than iframe
origi
Contact emails
mme...@chromium.org
Explainer
https://github.com/MattMenke2/Explainer---Partition-Network-State/blob/main/README.md
Specification
https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#connections
Summary
Partition network state by the network partition key (which consists of top
frame site and frame
what
sorts of cases the regressions affect most.
> Thanks.
>
> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 1:25:41 AM UTC-8 Yoav Weiss wrote:
>
>> Thanks for working on this important partitioning!
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 7:01 PM 'Matt Menke' via blink-dev <
performance here.
>
> (And we'll send a new I2S after that, rather than revive this thread.)
>
> Thanks everyone.
>
> On 2/2/22 1:05 PM, 'Matt Menke' via blink-dev wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback! Responses inline.
>
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 12:03
t;
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 10:06 AM Mike Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> FYI, we're going to run some other experiments to see how to improve
>>> performance here.
>>>
>>> (And we'll send a new I2S after that, rather than revive this thread.)
>>
Is that the only test removing this behavior breaks? I'm not seeing test
cases for simple IPv4 expansion cases, like just "http://127.1/";. I also
notice that in Firefox, http://127.1 is mapped to http://127.0.0.1/, but
http://[::1.2.3.] is not treated as a URL, so it's unclear to me if the
p
20 matches
Mail list logo
