Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Auto-generated view transition names

On Tuesday, March 25, 2025 at 5:12:17 AM UTC-4 Jake Archibald wrote: Let me try and explain the breaking case again. I'll describe it in terms of a React component for brevity, but the same issue exists with regular DOM. Here's a basic list of items, with a button that randomises the order of

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Use RegExp v flag instead of u for HTML pattern attribute

LGTM1 to ship with a killswitch flag, just in case. Thanks for the thorough analysis! On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 3:41 PM Mathias Bynens wrote: > I’ve continued analyzing UKM results and have now reached n=40 as Rick > suggested: > > | origin | link to analysis > |

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Remove support for loading media via filesystem:// URLs on Android

LGTM2 On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 5:51:12 PM UTC+1 chrishtr via Chromestatus wrote: > The deprecation plan sounds great to me, thanks! LGTM1 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivin

Re: [blink-dev] Question about Shipping vs Continue Experimenting

I'm not sure I have guidance on how y'all can get more OT usage and feedback. It seems to me that y'all are best positioned to assess the developer need and reach out to them to increase engagement. Devrel folks may be able to help. Without expectation for further engagement, I don't think it m

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Deprecated and remove font-family: -webkit-pictograph

LGTM3 On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 9:00 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2021-11-11 17:39, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > I discussed offline with font experts (Dominik in particular) and they > confirmed that removal of -webkit-pictograph would provide ok-looking > fallbacks. They also

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Deprecated and remove font-family: -webkit-pictograph

Link to the use counter? On Friday, November 5, 2021 at 3:00:27 PM UTC+1 ssi...@igalia.com wrote: > Average usage during October for font-family: webkit-pictograph was > 0.3094 > > On Thursday, August 19, 2021 at 9:44:00 AM UTC+3 yoav...@chromium.org > wrote: > >> I just re-ran the pictogra

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: renderpriority attribute

Thanks for working on this! It may be interesting to think through if/how this interacts with other prioritization work (on the network or on the script scheduling side). Adding Pat and Scott for visibility. On Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 10:08:03 PM UTC+2 Vladimir Levin wrote: > Contact em

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Reporting API: Isolate reports per-document and support the Reporting-Endpoints header

Still LGTM On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:48 PM Ian Clelland wrote: > In an exciting last minute turn of events, I've made progress on fixing > one of the last outstanding bugs regarding our implementation of the new > Reporting API spec, and I'd like to amend this intent to include that > change, b

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Reporting API: Isolate reports per-document and support the Reporting-Endpoints header

On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 12:31 PM Scott Helme wrote: > Hey Yoav, > > Thanks for linking me in, I'm happy to provide my feedback here. > > Transparency: I'm Scott Helme, the founder of Report URI > , which is a commercial service for allowing > websites to collect reports se

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Reporting API: Isolate reports per-document and support the Reporting-Endpoints header

*LGTM1* Thanks for working on this. IIUC, the motivation for this change is feedback from other vendors to enable non-persistent document-level reporting. I'm glad to see that reflected in Mozilla's position. On Thursday, September 2, 2021 at 8:21:50 PM UTC+2 icle...@chromium.org wrote: >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Service Worker subresource filter

That's perfectly fine. No need for an LGTM for such changes, but thanks for notifying the thread! :) On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 1:51:43 AM UTC+2 Noah Lemen wrote: > We ended up needing to make more changes to support enabling the feature > via origin trial: > https://chromium-review.googles