> On May 23, 2024, at 10:19 AM, Vladimir Levin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:00 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> I noticed that font-size-adjust-012.html, font-size-adjust-013.html, and
> parts of font-size-adjust-computed.html (e.g., ch-width
> Windows (Edge)?
>
> There are also 3 failing subtests in font-size-adjust-computed.html, does
> that depend on resolving one of the spec issues? Or can we match what Firefox
> and Safari do and pass the tests without waiting for spec changes?
>
> Best regards,
> Phil
iling subtests in font-size-adjust-computed.html, does
> that depend on resolving one of the spec issues? Or can we match what Firefox
> and Safari do and pass the tests without waiting for spec changes?
>
> Best regards,
> Philip
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:01 PM Vladimir
Hi Vladimir,
I requested the reviews in the chromestatus. Thanks.
--
ChangSeok
> On May 16, 2024, at 8:01 AM, Vladimir Levin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:02 AM ChangSeok Oh wrote:
> Contact emails
> changseok...@bytedance.com, changs...@chromium.org
Contact emails
changseok...@bytedance.com, changs...@chromium.org
Explainer
None
Specification
https://www.w3.org/TR/css-fonts-5/#font-size-adjust-prop
Summary
The font-size-adjust CSS property enhances readability consistency by
adjusting font size based on lowercase letter height rather than
> if ones don't already exist.
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:16 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote:
>
>> Hi Yoav,
>>
>> Yes, Safari and Firefox support the check method [1], and I confirmed it.
>> The test failures are due to other factors (e.g., pixel mismatches), no
On Oct 17, 2023, at 4:29 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 8:15 PM Mike Taylor wrote:
> LGTM2
> On 10/16/23 1:35 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
>> LGTM1
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 1:01 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote:
>> Contact emails
>&g
Contact emails
changseok...@bytedance.com, shivami...@gmail.com
Specification
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-font-loading/#font-face-set-check
Summary
The FontFaceSet's check() function verifies whether it's possible to
display text using the specified fonts without attempting to utilize fonts
i
uesday, July 11, 2023 at 7:56:36 AM UTC+1 ChangSeok Oh wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying the question.
>
>
> On 7/8/23 21:40, Sangwhan Moon wrote:
>>
>> On 2023年07月08日 07時03分10秒 (+09:00), ChangSeok Oh wrote:
>>
>> > How so?
>>
>> Sorry, wh
Thanks for clarifying the question.
On 7/8/23 21:40, Sangwhan Moon wrote:
On 2023年07月08日 07時03分10秒 (+09:00), ChangSeok Oh wrote:
> How so?
Sorry, what is your question?
If you were asking why the TAG review status was Not applicable, I have no
idea. That is the default text
, as we likely can't grow the Chrome
> binary by that much.
>
> Can you describe at which level in the stack do you plan to operate here, and
> which problem you're solving?
>
> Dominik
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 1:02 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote:
> Contact
Sorry, what is your question?
If you were asking why TAG review status was Not applicable, I have no idea.
That is the default text for unanswered slots at chromestatus.com. Gecko
implemented this feature first, so they might try the TAG review.
Unfortunately, I cannot find the pointer.
--
Cha
ter, unfortunately.
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 5:42:54 AM UTC-7 Sangwhan Moon wrote:
>
>
> On 2023年07月06日 19時02分40秒 (+09:00), ChangSeok Oh wrote:
>
> *Contact emails*
> changs...@bytedance.com, shiva...@gmail.com
>
> *Explainer*
> None
>
> *Specification*
> https://
gt; we likely can't grow the Chrome binary by that much.
>
> Can you describe at which level in the stack do you plan to operate here,
> and which problem you're solving?
>
> Dominik
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 1:02 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote:
>
>&
*Contact emails*
changseok...@bytedance.com, shivami...@gmail.com
*Explainer*
None
*Specification*
https://www.w3.org/TR/css-fonts-4/#font-variant-emoji-prop
*Summary*
The CSS property font-variant-emoji determines the default style used to
display emojis. In the past, this was achieved by addi
o the interaction between the two
> features in Blink?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dominik
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 12:56 AM ChangSeok Oh wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> Thanks for informing me about the history and conflict between @font-face:
> size-adjust and fo
act.
> Are there any problems arising from the use of both at the same time?
>
> Dominik
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 9:35 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 28, 2023, at 6:29 AM, David Baron wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 6:33 PM Chang
> On Mar 28, 2023, at 6:29 AM, David Baron wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 6:33 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote:
>Interoperability and Compatibility
>
>Gecko: Publicly support
>
>WebKit: Positive and in development
>https://bugs.webkit
> On Mar 28, 2023, at 6:29 AM, David Baron wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 6:33 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote:
>Interoperability and Compatibility
>
>Gecko: Publicly support
>
>WebKit: Positive and in development
>https://bugs.webkit
> On Mar 28, 2023, at 6:22 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 12:33 AM ChangSeok Oh wrote:
> Contact emails
> changseok...@bytedance.com, shivami...@gmail.com
>
> Explainer
> None
>
> Specification
> https://www.w3.or
*Contact emails*
changseok...@bytedance.com, shivami...@gmail.com
*Explainer*
None
*Specification*
https://www.w3.org/TR/css-fonts-5/#font-size-adjust-prop
*Summary*
The font-size-adjust CSS property adjusts the font size based on the height
of lowercase letters rather than that of uppercase
21 matches
Mail list logo
