Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Compression Dictionary Transport

y 29, 2024 at 10:22 AM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> Thanks all. LGTM to extend from 127 to 129 inclusive. >> On 5/29/24 10:51 AM, Patrick Meenan wrote: >> >> On the spec side of things, there is one more issue outstanding in the >> IETF discussion but it

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Compression Dictionary Transport

ICG) >> > Recently published > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-compression-dictionary/> > with > above-mentioned changes. > +Patrick Meenan can probably add precision there, > but it's making good progress in the HTTPWG. > > TAG review (see ex

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Remove Authorization header upon cross-origin redirect

anks!! :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 10:44 AM Kenichi Ishibashi < >>>>>>>>>> ba...@chromium.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: 'priority' HTTP request header

Contact emailspmee...@google.com ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9218 Summary This feature adds the 'priority' request header for all HTTP requests with the priority information for the request at the time that it was sent. RFC 9218 (Extensible Prioritization

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

Oct 11, 2023 at 12:12 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM to experiment in 120 > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 6:11 PM Patrick Meenan > wrote: > >> Sorry, forgot to mention the milestone - 120 for running the experiment. >> The code is in place to run the experiment as of 119 b

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

ast question: what milestones are you planning to run this experiment > on? > > On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at 7:02:51 PM UTC+2 Patrick Meenan wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:18 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > Can you briefly describe what the header parts are good for, and

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:04 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > So this will be sent in both H2 and H3? > Yes. As it stands right now, the Priority header will be sent in all cases where we prioritize (and already send frame-level priorities) on multiplexed connections (HTTP/2 and HTTP/3). The benefit

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:18 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > Can you briefly describe what the header parts are good for, and how would > developers use them? > There are 2 parts to the header which is formatted as a structured-field dictionary (comma-separated entries with each entry being key=value.

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

Contact emailspmee...@google.com ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9218 Summary This feature adds the 'priority' request header for all HTTP requests with the priority information for the request at the time that it was sent. RFC 9218 (Extensible Prioritization

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Compression dictionary transport with Shared Brotli

, just that they are separate discussions that should have the appropriate use cases and justifications laid out. On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 1:54 PM Patrick Meenan wrote: > We had put the compression stream API out of scope > <https://github.com/WICG/compression-dictionary-transport#compre

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Compression dictionary transport with Shared Brotli

We had put the compression stream API out of scope for the dictionary work because the dictionaries would require a different constructor that allows for specifying the dictionary bytes (or stream). That's independent of

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Remove Authorization header upon cross-origin redirect

Do we expect the Authorization header to be something that the HTTP Archive triggers in a way that the feature will trigger? Since they are all unauthenticated single page loads, it feels like it's unlikely to be something that we hit. On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 4:37 PM Patrick Meenan wrote

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Remove Authorization header upon cross-origin redirect

on 113? If so, HTTP Archive wouldn't pick that up until > the May crawl. > > cc @Patrick Meenan to keep me honest > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:19 AM Yoav Weiss > wrote: > >> It's possible that we need to wait for the next HA run to get actual >> examples. >&g

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: 'priority' HTTP request header

Contact emailspmee...@google.com Specificationhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9218 Summary This feature adds the 'priority' request header for all HTTP requests with the priority information for the request at the time that it was sent. RFC 9218 (Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP)

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Remove: HTTP/2 and gQUIC server push

PM Mitar wrote: > Hi! > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 4:19 PM Patrick Meenan > wrote: > > Presumably if you are protecting something behind HTTP Auth then the > PUSH is happening AFTER the 401 challenge and the browser has made the > follow-on request with

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Remove: HTTP/2 and gQUIC server push

Presumably if you are protecting something behind HTTP Auth then the PUSH is happening AFTER the 401 challenge and the browser has made the follow-on request with the Authorization header. If not, then the resources aren't actually protected by authorization and PUSH is bypassing the auth. In

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Priority Hints

they will only see the first one so I'm not sure it's much help even in that case since priority changes aren't plumbed through worker callbacks). On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 5:35 PM Patrick Meenan wrote: > I'm plumbing the support for the read-only priority property on Request > now. > >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Priority Hints

to see this feature ship. > > On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 10:20:40 AM UTC-8 Patrick Meenan wrote: > >> Contact emails ad...@chromium.org, kenjibah...@chromium.org, >> pmee...@chromium.org >> >> Explainer https://github.com/WICG/priority-hints/blob/main/EXPLA

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Priority Hints

Contact emailsad...@chromium.org, kenjibah...@chromium.org, pmee...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/priority-hints/blob/main/EXPLAINER.md Specificationhttps://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Summary Priority Hints provide developers a way to indicate a resource's relative fetch

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Priority Hints

8:27:56 AM UTC+2 Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> LGTM to experiment M96-M100 (inclusive). >> >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:39 PM Patrick Meenan >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 4:1

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Priority Hints

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 4:16 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 9:40 PM Patrick Meenan > wrote: > >> >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> Estimated milestones >>>> OriginTrial desktop last 101 >>>> Origin

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Priority Hints

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:49 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > Thanks for working on this!! > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 5:38 PM Patrick Meenan > wrote: > >> >> TAG review >> > > It might be good to spin up a TAG review. > Thanks. I'll start working on that no

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Priority Hints

Contact emailsad...@chromium.org, domfarol...@gmail.com, kenjibah...@chromium.org, pmee...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/priority-hints/blob/main/EXPLAINER.md Specificationhttps://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Summary Priority Hints provide developers a way to indicate a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to continue Experiment: Priority Hints

red a new OT, as the > previous one was run a while ago. > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:16 PM Patrick Meenan > wrote: > >> Contact emailsad...@chromium.org, domfarol...@gmail.com, >> kenjibah...@chromium.org, pmee...@chromium.org >> >> Explainerhttps://githu