[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS logical flow relative values

2023-08-08 Thread obr...@igalia.com
a les 21:57:58 UTC+2, obr...@igalia.com va escriure: > Contact emails obr...@igalia.com > > Explainer > https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2018/03/understanding-logical-properties-values/ > > Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-logical/#directional-keywords > https://dr

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Nesting

2023-02-10 Thread obr...@igalia.com
Will authors actually need to feature detect this? I mean, feature detection won’t make a difference to visitors as it will have the same net outcome to them: the nested styles will not be applied in browsers that don’t support nesting. I can imagine authors using nesting in inline styles, and

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Nesting

2023-02-09 Thread obr...@igalia.com
sted upthread, and I agree that >>> anything that has a non-trivial risk of causing interop/compat problems >>> down the line is worth spending extra time on. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Philip >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 2:17

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Nesting

2023-02-01 Thread obr...@igalia.com
inue iterating >> together? >> >> Thanks, >>Rick >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 3:46 AM Philip Jägenstedt >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Oriol, >>> >>> Thanks for raising that there may be some spec changes that

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Nesting

2023-01-26 Thread obr...@igalia.com
I don't see the danger of a priority of constituencies inversion. Authors can use preprocessors, just like they have been using for several years, so I don't get where the hurry comes from. In fact, I would argue that hurrying to ship a future without having discussed the details just tends to