Re: [blink-dev] Intend to extend experiment: Long Animation Frame Timing

Thanks. LGTM to extend 3 more milestones (I believe M121 to M123 inclusive). On 11/17/23 4:17 AM, Noam Rosenthal wrote: On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:28 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Noam, Ack on the OT bugs (been there...); could you comment on any substantial progress in the

Re: [blink-dev] Intend to extend experiment: Long Animation Frame Timing

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:28 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Hi Noam, > > Ack on the OT bugs (been there...); could you comment on any substantial > progress in the following areas: > >- Draft spec (early draft is ok, but must be spec-like and associated >with the appropriate standardization

Re: [blink-dev] Intend to extend experiment: Long Animation Frame Timing

Hi Noam, Ack on the OT bugs (been there...); could you comment on any substantial progress in the following areas: * Draft spec (early draft is ok, but must be spec-like and associated with the appropriate standardization venue, or WICG) * TAG review (see exceptions) *

[blink-dev] Intend to extend experiment: Long Animation Frame Timing

Contact emailsnrosent...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/w3c/longtasks/blob/main/loaf-explainer.md Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/longtasks/blob/main/loaf-explainer.md Summary We propose extending the "Long Animation Frame Timing" experiment. The experiment has several active