Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS "overflow" media features

LGTM3 On 3/15/23 10:09 AM, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: LGTM2 On 14/03/2023 16:13, Daniil Sakhapov wrote: Done: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/146 On Wednesday, March 8, 2023 at 6:09:22 PM UTC+1 Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 % filing a WebKit position We discussed

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS "overflow" media features

LGTM2 On 14/03/2023 16:13, Daniil Sakhapov wrote: > Done: > https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/146 > > On Wednesday, March 8, 2023 at 6:09:22 PM UTC+1 Yoav Weiss wrote: > > LGTM1 % filing a WebKit position > > We discussed this intent at the API owner meeting (Rick, Ch

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS "overflow" media features

Done: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/146 On Wednesday, March 8, 2023 at 6:09:22 PM UTC+1 Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 % filing a WebKit position > > We discussed this intent at the API owner meeting (Rick, Chris, Daniel, > MikeT, Philip,, Alex and myself). We agreed that there

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS "overflow" media features

LGTM1 % filing a WebKit position We discussed this intent at the API owner meeting (Rick, Chris, Daniel, MikeT, Philip,, Alex and myself). We agreed that there's value in filing a WebKit position issue here, if anything to put this on their radar (pun not intended) and let them know we intend to s

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS "overflow" media features

I think this feature falls under Implementations of already-defined consensus-based standards in our process, and Signals from other implementations in an intent-to-ship

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS "overflow" media features

Our history with the WebKit project suggests that imputations of implicit consent are unwelcome, and so in addition to the general orientation of our process towards explicit evidence, it is in the interest of respecting the WebKitten's own preferences that we ask formally. Best, Alex On Frid

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS "overflow" media features

> On 4Mar 2023, at 5:59, Alex Russell wrote: > > Our process does not pay much mind to arbitrary standards gates when others > have not already shipped. If WebKit had (has?) implemented, that would > shortcut our analysis, otherwise, it's still worth asking. The point is not about what the W3

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS "overflow" media features

Our process does not pay much mind to arbitrary standards gates when others have not already shipped. If WebKit had (has?) implemented, that would shortcut our analysis, otherwise, it's still worth asking. Best, Alex On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 12:51:02 PM UTC-8 fantasa...@inkedblade.net wrot

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS "overflow" media features

On 3/1/23 08:22, Yoav Weiss wrote: Interoperability and Compatibility /Gecko/: Shipped/Shipping /WebKit/: No signal Similar to the other intent, can you ask for a WebKit position and see if we know of a developer signal for this? The feature is in a CR-level CSS spec,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS "overflow" media features

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 4:18 PM Daniil Sakhapov wrote: > Contact emailssakha...@chromium.org > > Specification > https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/mediaqueries/#mf-overflow-block > > Summary > > Implements "overflow-inline" and "overflow-block" media features. Allows > to distinguish styles for

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS "overflow" media features

Contact emailssakha...@chromium.org Specification https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/mediaqueries/#mf-overflow-block Summary Implements "overflow-inline" and "overflow-block" media features. Allows to distinguish styles for displays with different overflow characteristics. Blink componentBlink>