Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

Excellent, we have a plan! On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 7:13:36 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM3, with same condition. > On 12/20/23 11:58 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > LGTM2 to ship, with a commitment to move this part of the spec to WICG if > it gets removed from the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

LGTM3, with same condition. On 12/20/23 11:58 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 to ship, with a commitment to move this part of the spec to WICG if it gets removed from the mediacapture-extensions spec. On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:06 AM Alex Russell wrote: LGTM1 On Thursday,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

LGTM2 to ship, with a commitment to move this part of the spec to WICG if it gets removed from the mediacapture-extensions spec. On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:06 AM Alex Russell wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Thursday, December 14, 2023 at 8:00:41 AM UTC-8 Rick Byers wrote: > >> Sounds good Henrik! Yes,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

LGTM1 On Thursday, December 14, 2023 at 8:00:41 AM UTC-8 Rick Byers wrote: > Sounds good Henrik! Yes, from our brief discussion in the API owners > meeting I believe you have support from at least 3 API owners to proceed in > this direction. It's important to us that we engage constructively

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

Sounds good Henrik! Yes, from our brief discussion in the API owners meeting I believe you have support from at least 3 API owners to proceed in this direction. It's important to us that we engage constructively in the standards process even in areas of differing opinion, but it's also crucial to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

Thanks, Rick. Responses inline. On Wednesday, December 13, 2023 at 6:39:48 PM UTC+1 Rick Byers wrote: I looked into the details of the standards debate on this issue. It sounds like it's still unclear whether the spec for this has WG support or not, right? I certainly wouldn't want to mislead

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:39 PM Rick Byers wrote: > I looked into the details of the standards debate on this issue. It sounds > like it's still unclear whether the spec for this has WG support or not, > right? I certainly wouldn't want to mislead anyone as to API maturity / > likely

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

I looked into the details of the standards debate on this issue. It sounds like it's still unclear whether the spec for this has WG support or not, right? I certainly wouldn't want to mislead anyone as to API maturity / likely interoperability by shipping based on a WebRTC WG specification if

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

Contact emails h...@chromium.org, o...@chromium.org, h...@chromium.org Specification https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-extensions/#the-mediastreamtrackaudiostats-interface Summary The MediaStreamTrack Statistics API, or `track.stats`, has already shipped for video tracks: see previous I2S

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

LGTM3 On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:36 AM 'Henrik Boström' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > https://chromestatus.com/feature/5087376775053312 > > On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 4:09:32 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > >> Also, could you please create a chromestatus entry and request

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

https://chromestatus.com/feature/5087376775053312 On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 4:09:32 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > Also, could you please create a chromestatus entry and request the various > review gate bits? > On 10/11/23 10:08 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: > > LGTM2 > On 10/11/23 8:49 AM,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

Also, could you please create a chromestatus entry and request the various review gate bits? On 10/11/23 10:08 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 10/11/23 8:49 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1, this is a minor addition to an existing API, was discussed in the WG at TPAC, and has a positive

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

LGTM2 On 10/11/23 8:49 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1, this is a minor addition to an existing API, was discussed in the WG at TPAC, and has a positive standards position from Mozilla. On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 4:16 PM Henrik Boström wrote: *Contant emails:* h...@chromium.org,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

LGTM1, this is a minor addition to an existing API, was discussed in the WG at TPAC, and has a positive standards position from Mozilla. On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 4:16 PM Henrik Boström wrote: > *Contant emails:* > h...@chromium.org, h...@chromium.org > > *Explainer:* > This is a small addition to

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

*Contant emails:* h...@chromium.org, h...@chromium.org *Explainer:* This is a small addition to the MediaStreamTrack . The new `track.stats` attribute getter allows a JS app to obtain statistics of a