We decided not to ship `ruby-base` at this time due to an interoperability
concern.
We'll reconsider it while looking at the status of WebKit.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:11 AM TAMURA, Kent wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 12:53 AM Rick Byers wrote:
>
>> Hey Kent,
>> To Fantasai's point, can y
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 12:53 AM Rick Byers wrote:
> Hey Kent,
> To Fantasai's point, can you point to the specific WPT test cases for this
> intent? Are Chrome or Firefox failing any, and if so can you explain why?
>
> Tentative LGTM2 assuming WPT coverage shows we're matching Firefox
> behavior.
LGTM3 but attend to Rick's comment below before shipping.
(Fantasia/Kent: It should be possible to test the implementation using
the flags the WPT bots use to test so I assume Fantasia can test it with
an appropriate flag and new enough build?
chrome://flags/#enable-experimental-web-platform-f
Hey Kent,
To Fantasai's point, can you point to the specific WPT test cases for this
intent? Are Chrome or Firefox failing any, and if so can you explain why?
Tentative LGTM2 assuming WPT coverage shows we're matching Firefox
behavior. Also happy to discuss the nuance here first if it's not
comple
On 10/19/23 22:39, TAMURA, Kent wrote:
fantasai wrote:
> It seems you're listing a subset of values, which makes me wonder what
> differences you would be introducing between Blink's behavior and the
> behavior described in the specs (if any)?
I think the new behavior will be a subset of CSS ru
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 11:39 AM TAMURA, Kent wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 4:42 AM fantasai
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/19/23 03:41, TAMURA, Kent wrote:
>> >
>> > Specification
>> >
>> > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ruby-1/#ruby-display
>> >
>> > Summary
>> >
>> > New CSS display
I found the HTML specification already had the following:
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/C/#phrasing-content-3
ruby { display: ruby; }
rt { display: ruby-text; }
I think what we should do is to remove algorithms at
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/C/#the-ruby-element:the-ruby-element-19 .
On Fri, Oc
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 4:42 AM fantasai
wrote:
> On 10/19/23 03:41, TAMURA, Kent wrote:
> >
> > Specification
> >
> > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ruby-1/#ruby-display
> >
> > Summary
> >
> > New CSS displayproperty values, "ruby", "ruby-base", and "ruby-text",
> are
> > added. T
Oh, I made a mistake! This intent should drop the part of and
'ruby-base'. I don't intend to introduce the "ruby + rb + rt" model. I'd
like to change the current "ruby + rt" model to "display:ruby +
display:ruby-text". Sorry for the confusion!
Anyway I should make a PR for the HTML specificati
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:33 PM Jeffrey Yasskin
wrote:
> My reading of #1771 is that the only thing keeping out of HTML is the
> lack of a Blink or WebKit implementation. It looks like
> https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/6478 is already written to improve
> the text, so the only thing for Ken
On 10/19/23 03:41, TAMURA, Kent wrote:
Specification
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ruby-1/#ruby-display
Summary
New CSS displayproperty values, "ruby", "ruby-base", and "ruby-text", are
added. The default display values of , and are changed to
them, and ruby layout respec
My reading of #1771 is that the only thing keeping out of HTML is the
lack of a Blink or WebKit implementation. It looks like
https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/6478 is already written to improve the
text, so the only thing for Kent to do is to make sure that this change
implements that PR and th
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 4:41 PM TAMURA, Kent wrote:
> Contact emailstk...@chromium.org
>
> ExplainerNone
>
> Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-ruby-1/#ruby-display
>
> Summary
>
> New CSS display property values, "ruby", "ruby-base", and "ruby-text",
> are added. The default display value
Contact emailstk...@chromium.org
ExplainerNone
Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-ruby-1/#ruby-display
Summary
New CSS display property values, "ruby", "ruby-base", and "ruby-text", are
added. The default display values of , and are changed to
them, and ruby layout respects these displ
14 matches
Mail list logo
