On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 5:19 PM Mike Taylor wrote:
> On 5/1/23 10:16 AM, Noam Rosenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 5:15 PM Mike Taylor wrote:
>
>> Hi Noam,
>>
>> Given the results, I would say you have the LGTMs you need to ship. Are
>> you currently launched at 100% via Finch? LGTM to
On 5/1/23 10:16 AM, Noam Rosenthal wrote:
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 5:15 PM Mike Taylor wrote:
Hi Noam,
Given the results, I would say you have the LGTMs you need to
ship. Are you currently launched at 100% via Finch? LGTM to enable
in tip of tree if so.
No, should I slowly
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 5:15 PM Mike Taylor wrote:
> Hi Noam,
>
> Given the results, I would say you have the LGTMs you need to ship. Are
> you currently launched at 100% via Finch? LGTM to enable in tip of tree if
> so.
>
No, should I slowly enable finch until it's 100% before enabling?
--
You
Hi Noam,
Given the results, I would say you have the LGTMs you need to ship. Are
you currently launched at 100% via Finch? LGTM to enable in tip of tree
if so.
later,
Mike
On 5/1/23 2:06 AM, Noam Rosenthal wrote:
Additional LGTMs?
On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 6:58:20 PM UTC+3 Noam
Additional LGTMs?
On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 6:58:20 PM UTC+3 Noam Rosenthal wrote:
Following up on this.
I conducted a finch trial, which (expectedly) has shown no statistically
significant performance impact.
Note that the flag which the finch is based on only tests pages that
attempted to
Following up on this.
I conducted a finch trial, which (expectedly) has shown no statistically
significant performance impact.
Note that the flag which the finch is based on only tests pages that
attempted to reuse a prefetch.
I would like to proceed with removing the 5 minute rule. Would be
My LGTM still stands. Glad we're not seeing any related regressions!
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 7:43 AM Noam Rosenthal
wrote:
> Following up on this.
> I conducted a finch trial, which (expectedly) has shown no statistically
> significant performance impact.
> Note that the flag which the finch is
LGTM3
/Daniel
On 2023-01-14 05:11, Noam Rosenthal wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 7:19 PM Yoav Weiss wrote:
LGTM2 to launch this as a Finch experiment.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 5:55 PM Rick Byers
wrote:
LGTM1 from an API owners perspective. It's arguable whether
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 7:19 PM Yoav Weiss wrote:
> LGTM2 to launch this as a Finch experiment.
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 5:55 PM Rick Byers wrote:
>
>> LGTM1 from an API owners perspective. It's arguable whether this is
>> "web-exposed" at all, or just a browser performance heuristic you're
LGTM2 to launch this as a Finch experiment.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 5:55 PM Rick Byers wrote:
> LGTM1 from an API owners perspective. It's arguable whether this is
> "web-exposed" at all, or just a browser performance heuristic you're
> tweaking.
>
> From a performance perspective, your
LGTM1 from an API owners perspective. It's arguable whether this is
"web-exposed" at all, or just a browser performance heuristic you're
tweaking.
>From a performance perspective, your argument and UMA analysis is
compelling to me. But I've learned the hard way not to trust predictions of
Contact emails
nrosent...@chromium.org
Explainer
No specific explainer, but all the details are here:
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5087526916718592?context=myfeatures
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1345207=5%20minute=3
Spec
This feature was never specified!
A new
12 matches
Mail list logo
