Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Compute Pressure WebDriver endpoints

2024-06-25 Thread Chris Harrelson
LGTM3 On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 8:15 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 3:05 PM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> Thanks - LGTM1 >> >> On 6/24/24 11:02 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: >> > Done! >> > >> > Mike Taylor writes: >> >> Could you please request reviews for the

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Compute Pressure WebDriver endpoints

2024-06-25 Thread Vladimir Levin
LGTM2 On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 3:05 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > Thanks - LGTM1 > > On 6/24/24 11:02 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > > Done! > > > > Mike Taylor writes: > >> Could you please request reviews for the various review gate bits in > >> your chromestatus entry? > >> > >> > >> (privacy,

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Compute Pressure WebDriver endpoints

2024-06-24 Thread Mike Taylor
Thanks - LGTM1 On 6/24/24 11:02 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: Done! Mike Taylor writes: Could you please request reviews for the various review gate bits in your chromestatus entry? (privacy, security, enterprise... etc) On 6/19/24 3:54 AM, Mandy, Arnaud wrote: Contact emails

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Compute Pressure WebDriver endpoints

2024-06-24 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Done! Mike Taylor writes: > Could you please request reviews for the various review gate bits in > your chromestatus entry? > > > (privacy, security, enterprise... etc) > > > On 6/19/24 3:54 AM, Mandy, Arnaud wrote: >> Contact emails >> raphael.kubo.da.co...@intel.com >>

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Compute Pressure WebDriver endpoints

2024-06-24 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Complementing what Alex has said, seeking review from the WebDriver WG is not strictly necessary, and since these endpoints are modelled after the Generic Sensor and Device Posture ones it felt like there was no need to involve the WG before starting this Intent thread. As for BiDi support, Alex