"... That said, there is a machine coming that may be even better in
the future, as there is talk of RISC-V, which is a fully free and open
processor architecture that has the potential to be more powerful than
anything we've seen up to now. I'm watching this very closely."
I'd like to check
Le 28/04/2017 à 01:20, Linux for blind general discussion a écrit :
> The computers I use are ARM-based. One is based around an ARMv7 8-core
> 32-bit processor, and the other is based around an aarch64, (ARMv8)
> 64-bit quad-core processor. Both run from removable eMMC flash storage
> has a
The computers I use are ARM-based. One is based around an ARMv7 8-core
32-bit processor, and the other is based around an aarch64, (ARMv8)
64-bit quad-core processor. Both run from removable eMMC flash storage
has a capacity of 64GB on the 32-bit machine and 128GB on the 64-bit
machine. Either
I think it's fair to say that, for Linux to ever break into the
mainstream, we need mainstream PC makers and PC retailers to commit to
offering machines that come pre-installed with Linux and not hide
their Linux offerings where only those specifically looking for Linux
will find it.
Problem is,
Granted I am not reading all of this thread.
Still on all mac products for at least the last ten years typing command f5
starts voice over...it is not automatic of course since not everyone
desires it smiles.
No idea how you define new mac, but its been around for ages.
Karen
On Thu, 27 Apr
Yep. In fact, if you buy a new Mac, press the power button, and let it
sit, it’ll start talking, asking if you wish to enable Voiceover
and go through the /built in tutorial/, which no other screen
reader has. See, making Linux more useful for beginning users
will
Yes, that's true, and it's why some like the Emacspeak "audio desktop"
with its ability of playing media and presenting structured and
formatted text which no other interface has come close to yet.
Sure, Audacious is nice, and Emacs has no way of dealing with
According to John Heim:
# Kyle, it is just your opinion that a screen reader should not be in the
# kernel. And your reasoning for saying that amounts to that it shouldn't
# be in the kernel.
I'm sorry you have such a hard time fully reading what I wrote. I did
indeed give a fair number of
Hi,
Terminals exclude blind people for the remaining of society. It
requieres real computing skills. Rejected by many users who use computer
just to work. Terminal is unable to make the user have benefit with
modern Web techno. Well, it's a geek interface, amazing but not for
everybody. Just for
But we're talking about attracting blind users, right? Shells and
terminals are more natural for us than GUIs. Instructing the computer
is far more intuitive than pretending that it's a two-dimensional
surface with pictures on it.
Amanda
On 4/27/17, Linux for blind general discussion
Sure, but if eSpeak cannot read Emoji and such, and we want new users to
use the web, they’ll quickly see that as "just another thing to
file a bug about and hope some one will fix it." Although,
people on the audio games forum are getting into Linux, and
don’t seem
Le 27/04/2017 à 22:04, Linux for blind general discussion a écrit :
> According to Jean-Philippe MENGUAL:
> # That is why I think we should have pre-installed Linux computers, new,
> but to a typical Mac price.
>
> Not at all. I for one don't want to have to pay the ridiculous price of
> a Mac,
Good. Any work with speech dispatcher will go a long way.
--
Sent from Discordia using Gnus for Emacs.
Email: r.d.t.pra...@gmail.com
Long days and pleasant nights!
Linux for blind general discussion writes:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 02:27:12AM AEST, Linux for blind
According to r.d.t.prater:
# Otherwise, they’ll turn back to iOS, and Voiceover,
# which can speak Emoji and such, pretty quickly.
Not quite. I happen to know that Android and Google's speech synthesizer
can speak emojis as well, and has had such capability for some time. On
my Android
#+OPTIONS: latex:t toc:nil H:3
However way we do it, it sure needs doing if we want wide adoption of
Linux by the young blind, who /expect/ it to work.
--
Sent from Discordia using Gnus for Emacs.
Email: r.d.t.pra...@gmail.com
Long days and pleasant nights!
Linux for blind general
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 02:27:12AM AEST, Linux for blind general discussion
wrote:
> At this point, speech-dispatcher is not designed to be a text processor, as
> correct me if I'm wrong, but I do believe it assumes that supported
> synthesizers already have built in text processing capabilities.
Linux for blind general discussion writes:
> Sure, let synthesizers handle ASCII text, but give synthesizers the
> textual pronunciation of Unicode characters, such as smiling face.
Chris Brannon here.
This works fine if you assume that everyone wants English and
According to Jean-Philippe MENGUAL:
# That is why I think we should have pre-installed Linux computers, new,
but to a typical Mac price.
Not at all. I for one don't want to have to pay the ridiculous price of
a Mac, and adding to the price certainly doesn't add to the value of the
computer,
Kyle, it is just your opinion that a screen reader should not be in the
kernel. And your reasoning for saying that amounts to that it shouldn't
be in the kernel. You are making a meaningless distinction between a
serial console and a screen reader. What difference does it make if
there is a
Then we'd better get eSpeak supporting Unicode pronunciation before I
can confidently recommend anything besides Emacspeak to younger
generations. Otherwise, they’ll turn back to iOS, and Voiceover,
which can speak Emoji and such, pretty quickly. I know, I’m not
a
There's a company called System76 that appears to sell computers with
Ubuntu already installed. I think the URL is
https://system76.com
though I just used
www.system76.com
You should also be able to find at least laptops via the Free Software
Foundation site, and on these both the hardware
At this point, speech-dispatcher is not designed to be a text processor,
as correct me if I'm wrong, but I do believe it assumes that supported
synthesizers already have built in text processing capabilities. Any
pronunciation handling in either speech-dispatcher or a screen reader
should
well, the fact is, Speech Dispatcher is what Orca currently uses, so
that Orca doesn’t have to keep up with changes to eSpeak’s
functions. After all, having many communications between
synthesizers is why Emacspeak’s eSpeak support is so bad in the
first place,
Aall the money IAVIT has ever gotten has come from knowing someone. Most
corporate foundations don't even take unsolicited grant applications.
You have to get a sponsor in the company who can write the application
for you. And you kind of have to allow them to drive the project. There
may be
The only reason I had not already created a list was that I didn't want
to be rude. I didn't feel it was my place to say, "Hey, lets move the
list." And Red Hat has been kind to us for years. But I figure it can't
hurt to create a list on iavit.org. If it doesn't work out, no harm is
done. So
As I remember, Windows was always harder to install than Linux, even
as a sighted user. Granted, I think part of this is that Windows still
comes pre-installed on most PCs and has had this privilege since at
least the Win9x days while PCs with Linux pre-installed are still
fairly rare(hell, even
Saying a serial console is not kernel dependent is inaccurate and
misleading. The part that displays the kernel boot messages is
absolutely kernel dependent. I think you mean that you can get messages
even earlier by, as a seperate step, configuring a serial console in
the boot loader, right?
Sure, let synthesizers handle ASCII text, but give synthesizers the
textual pronunciation of Unicode characters, such as smiling face.
--
Sent from Discordia using Gnus for Emacs.
Email: r.d.t.pra...@gmail.com
Long days and pleasant nights!
Linux for blind general discussion
I would argue that the pronunciation of symbols should most certainly be
handled by the synthesizer rather than any intermediate layer. Letting
the intermediate layers handle symbol pronunciation will only cause lots
of problems similar to the "tiflda" problem we have in Speakup to this
day.
As of four years ago the Carrol Center was teaching only windows. I
know this as a Friend came in as did many others from different
countries. The goal was to learn what to teach blind folks in the
country they came from. Am I correct in thinking that Carrol center is
all funded from Washington
Tony Baechler here.
I have two major problems with this argument, namely what Chris says in that
Talking Arch should be a separate project. I feel strongly that speech and
Braille should be part of all boot media for all mainstream distros unless
it wouldn't be practical, such as for very
Tony Baechler here.
I'm sorry, but while your statement is true on paper, in reality, it's
wrong. I know for a fact that Microsoft pays a huge amount of money into the
W3C. I believe they are represented on the board. It isn't just them. Lots
of big companies pay into them. I saw the list
Hmm. Facebook groups? Perhaps? I could handle that, if it please ya.
Linux for the blind. Grant stuff, though, I’ll probably have to
leave for those who know about petitioning and such. However,
NVDA got plenty of grant money from Mozilla and Adobe, so we
could
I agree with you, but when you say schools, you mean the government.
They provide the majority of funding schools use for that sort of thing.
I did not think of a grant writer. That sounds like a good place to
start.
--Kelly Prescott
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017, Linux for blind general discussion
Kelly here.
You have valid points. I also believe the blind have different needs then
does many other disabilities.
Why not go with iavit.org. The list is blind specific, and John will
certainly be responsive to problems etc...
Also, this is a organization we could use to help our cause as
Tony Baechler here.
Your comments again emphasize the need for a nonprofit organization. I
wouldn't worry too much about the money. Funding will happen once the word
gets out. Oh, it takes time and it won't be immediate, but it can and will
happen. What we need is a grant writer. The
Tony Baechler here. I'm already doing this. It's a pain though and I'm going
to leave the list soon. I'm waiting to see what other lists people gravitate
to and whether a new list should be created.
The problem I see with already existing lists like the FSF and gnu.org is
they aren't really
37 matches
Mail list logo