Now that I think of it, since TCP wants a minimum of two un-acked packets,
you can just reduce the rate of your ACKs to keep the sender from flooding.
Total hack of course. It's really a packet-pacing issue.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Benjamin Cronce wrote:
> In the past I've seen issues w
In the past I've seen issues with Windows Updates because the CDN was 1 ms
away. TCP wants to have 2 segments in flight, resulting in a non-responsive
TCP stream below 13Mb/s. CDNs with low RTTs cause cause issues with low
bandwidth connections. Not only does DSL tend to have a low first hop
latenc
On 27 January 2017 at 15:40, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 23:55 -0800, Dave Täht wrote:
> >
> > On 1/26/17 11:21 PM, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > After having had some issues with inconcistent tso/gso configuration
> > > causing performance issues for sch_fq with
Thank you for answering!
On 27 January 2017 at 08:55, Dave Täht wrote:
>
>
> On 1/26/17 11:21 PM, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > After having had some issues with inconcistent tso/gso configuration
> > causing performance issues for sch_fq with pacing in one of my systems,
> > I wonde
All over the net I hear of the bloated horrors steam and windows 10
updates are inflicting on people, and several saying that inbound
shaping isn't helping. I finally got two captures of a steam download
here:
https://github.com/tohojo/sqm-scripts/issues/43#issuecomment-275281826
And aside from s
On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 15:49 +0100, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> quick question from the peanut gallery: on a typical home router with
> 1Gbps internal and <<100Mbps external interfaces, will giant packets
> will be generated by the 1Gbps interface (with acceptable latency)? I
> ask, as
Hi Eric,
quick question from the peanut gallery: on a typical home router with 1Gbps
internal and <<100Mbps external interfaces, will giant packets will be
generated by the 1Gbps interface (with acceptable latency)? I ask, as what
makes sense on a 1000Mbps ingress link, might still block an 20M
On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 23:55 -0800, Dave Täht wrote:
>
> On 1/26/17 11:21 PM, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > After having had some issues with inconcistent tso/gso configuration
> > causing performance issues for sch_fq with pacing in one of my systems,
> > I wonder if is it still recom
