I should explain that my motivation in writing the previous review is twofold:
1) I think the authors are very capable of doing great and valuable work. And
they have in the past done so.
2) Intellectual honesty, professional honesty, and rigor are values that seem
to have been declining over t
I will not be gentle here. THe authors deserve my typical peer-review feedback
as an expert in the field of wireless protocols and congestion. (Many of you on
the list are as well, I know, and may have different reviews. But I'm very
troubled by this paper's claims. It's interesting technically,
> On 11 Dec, 2019, at 9:54 pm, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> The DC folk want a multibit more immediate signal, for which L4S is
> kind of targetted, (and SCE also
> applies). I haven't seen any data on how well dctcp or SCE -style can
> work on wildly RTT varying links as yet, although it's been pitched
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:54 AM Dave Taht wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:19 AM Prateesh Goyal wrote:
> >
> > Adding Hari, Mohammad
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 2:17 PM Dave Taht wrote:
> >>
> >> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.03429.pdf
> >>
> >> the principal item of interest is section 3
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:19 AM Prateesh Goyal wrote:
>
> Adding Hari, Mohammad
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 2:17 PM Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.03429.pdf
>>
>> the principal item of interest is section 3.1.2 where the accelerate
>> and brake concepts and math are described.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.03429.pdf
the principal item of interest is section 3.1.2 where the accelerate
and brake concepts and math are described.
--
Make Music, Not War
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-435-0729
___
Bl
