On 2018-10-16 11:31, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Dave Taht wrote:
Vyos (the open source fork of vyatta) was one of the first to add
fq_codel support... I wonder
http://linuxgizmos.com/att-releases-white-box-spec-for-its-linux-based-5g-routers/
Isn't Vyos just runnin
On 2017-08-30 07:15, Aaron Wood wrote:
The current hypothesis that we have is that this is due to either
traffic class, or the ports that traffic are running on. I've ruled
out the ping streams, as a parallel set of netperf tcp_maerts
downloads has the same 120Mbps roof.
Also think of ser
* Quoting Stefan Alfredsson [16 Nov-16 07:00]:
> - Firefox tests were run yesterday at around lunchtime (~12.00 CET), and
> CLI tests just now (~06.40 CET). So time-of-day effect may be a reason for
> less bloat now. I'll do a better comparison when I get to my desktop.
I've
I had the same problem, getting no bloat report. I tested just now
running as root, and got bloat measurements in
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6166098 and
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6166295
From Firefox, I get somewhat higer latency (~100 ms) versus ~20-60 ms
via the command l
he network
throughput as the experiments are time bound (by default 60 seconds).
For 3.5G 100 Mbyte data was sent, and guesstimately 500 Mbyte received
(sorry, didn't capture the amount; but it can probably be found in
the trace files if necessary. However it all depends on your link
On 10/31/13 03:32 , Dave Taht wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:04:23AM +0100, Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
Hi, Stephen, the list,
We're running a 3G/4G measurement site at Karlstad university, with
mobile broadband subscriptions from the four major telecom operators
in Sweden. I was curio
measurable
buffering.
http://n1.netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/summary/id=43ca253f-6563-078896ce-dc0a-4333-9119
Regards,
Stefan Alfredsson
On 10/31/13 00:25 , Stephen Hemminger wrote:
I got one of these Samsung LTE hotspot.
Not surprisingly it has huge bloat and a stupid http proxy
that netalyzer claims r
