I have a working ping-over-http mobile browser app at alt.reed.com. feel free
to try it and look at the underlying packet stream with wireshark. I did a
prototype of a RRUL test using Web sockets and a modified nginx websocket
module as a server that could be commanded to generate precise tra
On 09/11/2014 06:48 PM, Rich Brown wrote:
Jonathan,
Could we make use of the existing test servers (running netperf) for that
demonstration? How hard is the protocol to fake in Javascript?
Not having coded a stitch of this, I *think* it would require the following:
- Web page on netperf-xx
Dave Taht writes:
> What if we could publish an open letter to the benchmark makers such
> as speedtest, explaining how engineering for their test does *not*
> make for a better internet? The press fallout from that letter, would
> improve some user education, regardless if we could get the tests
On 12 Sep, 2014, at 4:49 am, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
> So if ookla implemented a udp based test, changed it's statical weighting and
> data mining methods overnight. At least in NZ that might help.
Isn't that the whole point of this discussion?
- Jonathan Morton
_
Jonathan,
> Could we make use of the existing test servers (running netperf) for that
> demonstration? How hard is the protocol to fake in Javascript?
Not having coded a stitch of this, I *think* it would require the following:
- Web page on netperf-xxx.bufferbloat.net that served out the java
The speedof.me API probably can be used directly as the measurement of download
and upload - you can create a competing download or upload in Javascript using
a WebWorker talking to another server that supports the websocket API to force
buffer overflow. (sort of poor man's RRUL).
The speedo
On 12 Sep, 2014, at 3:35 am, dpr...@reed.com wrote:
> Among friends of mine, we can publicize this widely. But those friends
> probably would like to see how the measurement would work.
Could we make use of the existing test servers (running netperf) for that
demonstration? How hard is the p
Among friends of mine, we can publicize this widely. But those friends
probably would like to see how the measurement would work.
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 8:13pm, "Rich Brown"
said:
> ___
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> cerowrt-de...@lists
I will sign. It would be better if we had an actual demonstration of how to
implement a speedtest improvement.
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 12:03pm, "Dave Taht" said:
> The theme of networks being "engineered for speedtest" has been a
> common thread in nearly every conversation I've
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> If Verizon can petition the FCC to change the definition of
> broadband... why can't we petition speedtest to *change their test*?
> Switching to merely reporting the 98th percentile results for ping
> during an upload or download, instead of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
