Re: [Bloat] [Codel] The "Some Congestion Experienced" ECN codepoint - a new internet draft -

2019-03-11 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:14 AM Bob Briscoe wrote: > > Dave, > > L4S is far from dead. It's merely been working differently from how you're > used to. Those working on an L4S AQM (at least those in the cable industry) > had to have a private WG for the last ~18 months, but now we're allowed to

Re: [Bloat] [Codel] The "Some Congestion Experienced" ECN codepoint - a new internet draft -

2019-03-11 Thread Bob Briscoe
Dave, L4S is far from dead. It's merely been working differently from how you're used to. Those working on an L4S AQM (at least those in the cable industry) had to have a private WG for the last ~18 months, but now we're allowed to publish and talk openly again. Similarly, there's work under

Re: [Bloat] [Codel] The "Some Congestion Experienced" ECN codepoint - a new internet draft -

2019-03-11 Thread Dave Taht
Everybody, calm down. I put this out merely to get comment before we submitted the first of several drafts. That draft is now submitted and we've asked for a talk slot in the tsvwg for it. I cc'd the world to get quick initial feedback, and I want to shut this overbroad conversation down and move