Super, much appreciated!
My thoughts about "effective lifetime" just got a long tail, possibly
sufficient to wag the dog (:-))
Do you think we should be shifting to v6, and keeping v4 nearly
invariant to address the long tail?
--dave
On 2019-03-20 6:28 p.m., Jonathan Morton wrote:
> I still
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, David Collier-Brown wrote:
On 2019-03-20 4:29 p.m., David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, David Collier-Brown wrote:
On 2019-03-20 10:28 a.m., Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
This isn't a resource problem, it's a code problem. The IETF wants 10-15
year old hosts to be
I still have a functioning "UFO"-style Apple Airport Base Station from about
2000. I no longer have a convenient means of reconfiguring it (relies on a
real Mac within a certain range of vintages), let alone updating its firmware,
if Apple bothered to do that any more.
A lot of those died
On 2019-03-20 4:29 p.m., David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, David Collier-Brown wrote:
On 2019-03-20 10:28 a.m., Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
This isn't a resource problem, it's a code problem. The IETF wants
10-15 year old hosts to be able to connect to a network and perform
basic
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, David Collier-Brown wrote:
On 2019-03-20 10:28 a.m., Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
This isn't a resource problem, it's a code problem. The IETF wants 10-15
year old hosts to be able to connect to a network and perform basic
networking. It might not be very optimized, but
On 2019-03-20 10:28 a.m., Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019, Dave Taht wrote:
Another ietf idea that makes me crazy is the motto of "no host
changes" in homenet, and "dumb endpoints" - when we live in an age
where we have quad cores and AI coprocessors in everybody's hands.
Dumb
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019, Dave Taht wrote:
Another ietf idea that makes me crazy is the motto of "no host changes"
in homenet, and "dumb endpoints" - when we live in an age where we have
quad cores and AI coprocessors in everybody's hands.
This isn't a resource problem, it's a code problem. The
