On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:13:19 -0400
Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll sign too. (And I like the 98th percentile measure for each
direction to give a single number that represents what's happening. It
could include ping loss rate, as well...)
I'll sign too.
The 98th percentile
On Sep 12, 2014, at 3:17 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer jbro...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:13:19 -0400
Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll sign too. (And I like the 98th percentile measure for each
direction to give a single number that represents what's happening. It
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 08:16:46 -0400 Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 12, 2014, at 3:17 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer jbro...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:13:19 -0400 Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...]
The 98th percentile latency is of-cause
The theme of networks being engineered for speedtest has been a
common thread in nearly every conversation I've had with ISPs and
vendors using every base technology out there, be it dsl, cable,
ethernet, or fiber, for the last 4 years. Perhaps, in pursuing better
code, and RFCs, and the like,
Would it be possible to create this alternative test site, to show end
users that speed is not everything.
If you get a result with some comments, ala netalyzr, most people would
probably be happy with that?
Or just a netalyzr lite maybe?
Pedro
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Dave Taht
Dave,
I'll sign too. (And I like the 98th percentile measure for each direction to
give a single number that represents what's happening. It could include ping
loss rate, as well...)
But more importantly, an open letter would likely be more powerful than the
results I got from sending a note
