_SF
> >
> >
> >___
> >Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
> >Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
>
--
written by Karol M. Langner
Thu Apr 23 09:20:
Hi Egon,
Great, i don't think you need to list all the pages. I just provided it for
reference.
- Karol
On May 23 2014, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> Hi Karol, all,
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Karol M. Langner
> wrote:
> > You could also add cclib:
> > pap
lenium testing platform available
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> ___
> Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
> Blueobelisk-discuss@l
On Feb 10 2014, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Karol M. Langner
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > @Peter and others: does NWChem write CML? I was planning to do some work
> > on a NWChem parser in cclib (which will export CML itself), but i
e CML? I was planning to do some work
on a NWChem parser in cclib (which will export CML itself), but if NWChem
already writes CML that would not be a priority.
Cheers,
Karol
--
written by Karol M. Langner
Mon Feb 10 13:40:55 EST 2014
On Jan 22 2012, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Karol M. Langner
> >> They sure are independent, if that's what you mean by orthogonal,
> >> but many people would cla
On Jan 22 2012, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Karol M. Langner
> wrote:
> > Thanks for that info. I suppose small volume is good thing for a
> > high profile journal. And a high rejection rate means publication
> > in that journal wi
On Jan 19 2012, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Karol M. Langner
> wrote:
>
> >
> > One thing that occurred to me while reading this article was that OA would
> > probably benefit a lot from an elite, high profile journal. One that could
>
On Jan 18 2012, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Jérôme Pansanel
> wrote:
>
> > Dears,
> >
> > Did some one read this article:
> >
> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/jan/16/academic-publishers-enemies-science
> >
>
> Yes - Mike Taylor asked by to review it befo
