Hi Andreas,
On 07/01/2022 20:28, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I'd recommend to read through paragraph 2 of the statutes. The goals of
TDF are written down there.
I'd recommend all members of the board to follow this goals very closely
and take care of TDF's assets and pay attention that they are not
d
Hi Paolo
Am 08.01.22 um 12:00 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
Hi Andreas,
On 07/01/2022 20:28, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I'd recommend to read through paragraph 2 of the statutes. The goals of
TDF are written down there.
I'd recommend all members of the board to follow this goals very closely
and take care
Hi Andreas,
On 08/01/2022 12:44, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I, as member of this community and member of the board, have already
expressed my opinion but when it comes to voting I will (from the
18/02/2020) represent only 1 vote.
I know this situation, one of the reasons I didn't run for the board
Dear board, dear TDF members, all,
this proposal has sparked interesting discussions, that we should
continue. For the proposal at hand though, we've not received much if
any actionable feedback.
So I'd like to call for a vote soon, unless there's concrete input for
edits. Let's give this two mor
Hi *,
quick comment on the below -
Paolo Vecchi wrote:
> Very brief summary of the events:
>
> Back in March 2020, other new board members and I, started making enquiries
> in regards to why we weren't making available an up to date LOOL to the
> community. We were clearly "advertising" LOOL on
Hi Cor,
On 07/01/2022 20:39, Cor Nouws wrote:
It's easy to spend a lot of words that do not give a single insight on
the question if your proposed changes are respecting the boards duty to
foster a sustainable meritocratic community.
while the comment doesn't add much to the debate of the "attic
