Re: [board-discuss] Advisory Board Membership of Rubitech-Astra

2022-02-25 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi Sophie, thanks for your support. I also thank Paolo and Simon for their backing too. It would be great, if TDF could make a decision on this topic during this evening and create a statement. I think physical integrity, self-determination, freedom of expression are indispensable foundations of

Re: [board-discuss] Advisory Board Membership of Rubitech-Astra

2022-02-25 Thread Sophie
Le 25 février 2022 20:27:15 GMT+01:00, Sophie a écrit : > > >Le 25 février 2022 14:29:06 GMT+01:00, Andreas Mantke a écrit : >>Hi, >> >>according to the TDF website >>(https://www.documentfoundation.org/governance/advisory-board/) LLC >>Rubitech-Astra is currently member of the TDF Advisoriy

Re: [board-discuss] Advisory Board Membership of Rubitech-Astra

2022-02-25 Thread Sophie
Le 25 février 2022 14:29:06 GMT+01:00, Andreas Mantke a écrit : >Hi, > >according to the TDF website >(https://www.documentfoundation.org/governance/advisory-board/) LLC >Rubitech-Astra is currently member of the TDF Advisoriy Board. I looked >onto this wikipedia page:

[board-discuss] Re: Draft document for TDF in-house developers proposal

2022-02-25 Thread Michael Stahl
On 25.02.22 15:43, Paolo Vecchi wrote: Hi Michael, thanks for your feedback. On 25/02/2022 10:22, Michael Meeks wrote: > In the graph above the committers have been grouped in Commercial > (companies specialised in selling LibreOffice development and > products), Corporate (companies and

Re: [board-discuss] Advisory Board Membership of Rubitech-Astra

2022-02-25 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Andreas, thanks for spotting this. While most Russian people and organisations have nothing to do with with the horrible ongoing conflict, RusBITech seems to be mostly engaged with the Russian military complex and we surely don't want to be associated with enablers of what is going on.

[board-discuss] Re: Draft document for TDF in-house developers proposal

2022-02-25 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Michael, thanks for your feedback. On 25/02/2022 10:22, Michael Meeks wrote: On 23/02/2022 16:01, Paolo Vecchi wrote: Thanks to your comments I started writing a more structured proposal Thanks for doing that that - it helps. There are some good things about this proposal that are

Re: [board-discuss] Advisory Board Membership of Rubitech-Astra

2022-02-25 Thread Simon Phipps
I support the request Andreas had make and ask the Board to act as soon as possible. S. On Fri, 25 Feb 2022, 13:30 Andreas Mantke, wrote: > Hi, > > according to the TDF website > (https://www.documentfoundation.org/governance/advisory-board/) LLC > Rubitech-Astra is currently member of the

[board-discuss] Advisory Board Membership of Rubitech-Astra

2022-02-25 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi, according to the TDF website (https://www.documentfoundation.org/governance/advisory-board/) LLC Rubitech-Astra is currently member of the TDF Advisoriy Board. I looked onto this wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RusBITech. There is stated that their software is used for the

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Draft document for TDF in-house developers proposal

2022-02-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On 24/02/2022 15:56, Paolo Vecchi wrote: On 24/02/2022 13:42, Michael Weghorn wrote: Regarding app stores (p. 5), IIRC, Michael (Meeks) suggested to separate that topic from the current discussion, which I think makes sense. I think it would make sense to focus on identifying

[board-discuss] Re: Draft document for TDF in-house developers proposal

2022-02-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On 23/02/2022 16:01, Paolo Vecchi wrote: Thanks to your comments I started writing a more structured proposal Thanks for doing that that - it helps. There are some good things about this proposal that are reasonable. You can find the draft which starts outlining various concepts and

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Draft document for TDF in-house developers proposal

2022-02-25 Thread Ilmari Lauhakangas
On 25.2.2022 10.29, Paolo Vecchi wrote: Hi Ilmari, thanks for the feedback. On 25/02/2022 09:06, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: Indeed, interop is very far from a neglected topic. Would definitely not include it as a focus area. Ilmari Is the whole Interoperability area that is well looked

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Draft document for TDF in-house developers proposal

2022-02-25 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Ilmari, thanks for the feedback. On 25/02/2022 09:06, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: Indeed, interop is very far from a neglected topic. Would definitely not include it as a focus area. Ilmari Is the whole Interoperability area that is well looked after or just MSO? Any other file formats

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Draft document for TDF in-house developers proposal

2022-02-25 Thread Ilmari Lauhakangas
On 25.2.2022 3.43, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Michael Weghorn wrote: Regarding interoperability with MSO (p. 6), I don't have the impression that this is in general a neglected topic that would necessarily need special attention from TDF side at this point (in addition to what's already happening