Re: [board-discuss] Re: Progress on Inhouse-Developer Proposal?

2022-11-19 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi all, just a few comments. On 19/11/2022 22:10, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Hi all, Andreas Mantke wrote: I read about the decision to create a new CoC committee from community members (https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg01000.html). Just to insert here,

[board-discuss] Re: Progress on Inhouse-Developer Proposal?

2022-11-19 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi all, Andreas Mantke wrote: > I read about the decision to create a new CoC committee from community > members > (https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg01000.html). > Just to insert here, that the new CoC process is, in my mind, unambiguously positive, and I'm

Re: Progress on Inhouse-Developer Proposal? (was Re: [board-discuss] Agenda for TDF board meeting on Monday, November 14th, 1800 Berlin time (UTC+1))

2022-11-19 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi all, Am 18.11.22 um 11:30 schrieb Paolo Vecchi: (...) (I won't comment much on the perceived attempt of delaying this proposal further as my comments on a similar thread led to my "conviction" for a CoC offence by the board. As I complained about the fact that the case has been handled by

Re: Progress on Inhouse-Developer Proposal? (was Re: [board-discuss] Agenda for TDF board meeting on Monday, November 14th, 1800 Berlin time (UTC+1))

2022-11-19 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi Thorsten, hi all, Am 18.11.22 um 11:31 schrieb Thorsten Behrens: Hi all, Andreas Mantke wrote: If the majority of the board acts in this way further, TDF inhouse developers will not be hired during its tenure of office. There's no need for that level of negativity. Rest assured, the