Hi Paolo, all,
Paolo Vecchi wrote on 23/02/2022 17:01:
...
You can find the draft which starts outlining various concepts and lists
some of the issues we have to address here:
https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/fM8pCesPnF2JjN4
Thanks for sharing that!
From the various
On 25.02.22 15:43, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
Hi Michael,
thanks for your feedback.
On 25/02/2022 10:22, Michael Meeks wrote:
> In the graph above the committers have been grouped in Commercial
> (companies specialised in selling LibreOffice development and
> products), Corporate (companies and
Hi Michael,
thanks for your feedback.
On 25/02/2022 10:22, Michael Meeks wrote:
On 23/02/2022 16:01, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
Thanks to your comments I started writing a more structured proposal
Thanks for doing that that - it helps. There are some good things
about this proposal that are
On 24/02/2022 15:56, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
On 24/02/2022 13:42, Michael Weghorn wrote:
Regarding app stores (p. 5), IIRC, Michael (Meeks) suggested to
separate that topic from the current discussion, which I think makes
sense.
I think it would make sense to focus on identifying
On 23/02/2022 16:01, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
Thanks to your comments I started writing a more structured proposal
Thanks for doing that that - it helps. There are some good things about
this proposal that are reasonable.
You can find the draft which starts outlining various concepts and
On 25.2.2022 10.29, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
Hi Ilmari,
thanks for the feedback.
On 25/02/2022 09:06, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote:
Indeed, interop is very far from a neglected topic. Would definitely
not include it as a focus area.
Ilmari
Is the whole Interoperability area that is well looked
Hi Ilmari,
thanks for the feedback.
On 25/02/2022 09:06, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote:
Indeed, interop is very far from a neglected topic. Would definitely
not include it as a focus area.
Ilmari
Is the whole Interoperability area that is well looked after or just MSO?
Any other file formats
On 25.2.2022 3.43, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Michael Weghorn wrote:
Regarding interoperability with MSO (p. 6), I don't have the
impression that this is in general a neglected topic that would
necessarily need special attention from TDF side at this point (in
addition to what's already happening
Hi *,
Michael Weghorn wrote:
> > > Regarding interoperability with MSO (p. 6), I don't have the
> > > impression that this is in general a neglected topic that would
> > > necessarily need special attention from TDF side at this point (in
> > > addition to what's already happening e.g. via
Hi Paolo,
thanks for your reply and additional explanations!
On 24/02/2022 16.56, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
Yes the initial plan is to look at the general areas and then the team
will work out with the developers which bugs they can start tackling on
their own, with mentoring and/or with experts
Hi Michael,
thanks for the extensive contribution! :-)
On 24/02/2022 13:42, Michael Weghorn wrote:
Hi Paolo,
thanks a lot.
I haven't added an extensive list of bugs or improvements in the main
document as I think we should, with your feedback and with TDF's
team, create a set of addendum
Hi Paolo,
thanks a lot.
I haven't added an extensive list of bugs or improvements in the main
document as I think we should, with your feedback and with TDF's team,
create a set of addendum for each area.
Regardless of the progress of this proposal I will ask the board to
involve TDF's
12 matches
Mail list logo
