Montag, 9. Januar 2023 09:23:32
An: Thorsten Behrens; TDF Board Discussion; Björn Ranft
Cc: Marina Latini
Betreff: Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document
Foundation
Hi,
Am 02.01.23 um 10:37 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
- wollmux-config-service (not used in WollMux yet, might be
Hi,
Am 02.01.23 um 10:37 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
- wollmux-config-service (not used in WollMux yet, might be
effectively abandoned - Björn, what do you think?)
wollmux-conf-service is a server side helper to deliver user specific
conf files (to avoid deploying different wollmux.conf manual
Hi
Am 02.01.23 um 13:25 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Doesn't feel terribly off-topic here (dev list would also not be a
100% on-topic match, neither website or marketing? - but for very
generic discussions, there's always the global discuss list of
course).
You could open a topic at https://commu
Hi Thorsten, Marina, all,
Le 02/01/2023 à 13:25, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
Hi Marina, all,
[...]
Doesn't feel terribly off-topic here (dev list would also not be a
100% on-topic match, neither website or marketing? - but for very
generic discussions, there's always the global discuss list of
bject with [WollMux]?
Greetings
Susanne
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Thorsten Behrens
Gesendet: Montag, 2. Januar 2023 13:26
An: Marina Latini
Cc: TDF Board Discussion
Betreff: Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document
Foundation
Hi Marina, all,
Marina Latini wrote:
> No n
Hi Marina, all,
Marina Latini wrote:
> No no, it makes sense to keep WollMux under the LibreOffice org, I agree. If
> you are fine with the current status, can we start to work on WollMux?
>
I'd love to! :)
(Gabor is getting the last few handbook pages' existing German
translation put up on the
On 02.01.2023 12:08, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Marina, all,
marina latini wrote:
The WollMux repos are now under the LibreOffice GitHub organisation
that, to my understanding, should be just a read only mirror from
our git instance hosting the LibreOffice source code.
That place was picked o
Hi Marina, all,
marina latini wrote:
> The WollMux repos are now under the LibreOffice GitHub organisation
> that, to my understanding, should be just a read only mirror from
> our git instance hosting the LibreOffice source code.
>
That place was picked on purpose, since (in contrast to e.g. the
Hello Thorsten, hi all,
Thanks for taking care of those changes. I have a doubt that I would like to
clarify before starting to have contributors pushing changes to this new place.
The WollMux repos are now under the LibreOffice GitHub organisation that, to my
understanding, should be just a re
Dear all,
I wrote:
> Since there seems to be no general concerns, I'd then use the quiet
> period next week, to switch the github repos over to the libreoffice
> org. After that, we can look into the Jenkins setup.
>
This has happened meanwhile:
- WollMux - https://github.com/LibreOffice/WollMux
Dear all,
Marina Latini wrote:
> On 05.12.2022 08:10, Samuel Mehrbrodt wrote:
> > Yes, these should be converted to master (after checking they are still
> > valid).
>
> yes, some help in closing invalid issues will be extremely valuable.
>
We can certainly look into that next year (CI needs goi
ienstag, 6. Dezember 2022 08:06
An: susanne.mohn...@kiel-pries.de; 'Marina Latini'
; 'Samuel Mehrbrodt'
Cc: 'Thorsten Behrens' ; 'Björn Ranft'
; 'TDF Board Discussion'
Betreff: Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document
Servus Susanne,
=
Foreword:
I here speak in my capacity as a Member of the Board of Trustees.
=
Am 06.12.22 um 07:01 schrieb susanne.mohn...@kiel-pries.de:
And Woll? It's the german name for wool.
AFAICS, in this case it makes reference to the German/Bavarian
"Eierlegendewollmilchsau".
htt
richt-
Von: Marina Latini
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Dezember 2022 01:19
An: Samuel Mehrbrodt
Cc: Thorsten Behrens ; Björn Ranft
; TDF Board Discussion
Betreff: Re: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document
Foundation
On 05.12.2022 08:10, Samuel Mehrbrodt wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Samu
On 05.12.2022 08:10, Samuel Mehrbrodt wrote:
Hi,
Hi Samuel,
nice to read you :)
To clarify - my expectation is, once the project would be at TDF's,
that future PRs would be done in English (as the most inclusive way).
All current PRs against master are in English already.
There are a few
Hi,
Hi Marina, all,
to keep this conversation going -
I wrote:
Marina Latini wrote:
As per today, there are 8 open pull requests[5] and some of them are in
German. Is there any plan to translate the content or close the PRs in
German and reopen new PRs in English?
I'd leave that to the m
Hi Marina, all,
to keep this conversation going -
I wrote:
> Marina Latini wrote:
> > As per today, there are 8 open pull requests[5] and some of them are in
> > German. Is there any plan to translate the content or close the PRs in
> > German and reopen new PRs in English?
> >
> I'd leave that
Hi Marina,
Marina Latini wrote:
> The license is "EUPL-1.1" but looking at some of the subfolders I found for
> example also mentions to GNU LGPLv2 [1].
>
Yep, that's part of the LibreOffice l10n tools, that Samuel was
cloning recently from there (and as such a build-time, not a runtime
component)
Hi Marina,
Thanks a lot for your analysis, I jump on two subjects:
Le 24/11/2022 à 22:35, Marina Latini a écrit :
On 23.11.2022 12:12, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Dear community,
Hello Thorsten, hello all,
[...]
# Topic: naming and conventions
I'm aware that there's an ongoing translation f
On 23.11.2022 12:12, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Dear community,
Hello Thorsten, hello all,
as announced during LibOCon, and subsequently discussed in the ESC,
here's the formal adoption proposal for the "WollMux" template / form
letter / mail merge engine / Java extension, from the City of Munic
Hi Sophie,
sophi wrote:
> just for clarity for all, what would prevent it to be released as an
> extension on the extension site? is it too complex?
>
No, not at all, just needs someone updating it there (an older release
is available already:
https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/
Hi Susanne, all,
Susanne LO wrote:
> I will try to install wollmux, it does not work today.
> If it works, ipost some examples.
>
WollMux 18.2.10
(https://github.com/WollMux/WollMux/releases/tag/RELEASE_18.2.10), the
latest release, is only tested to work with LibreOffice 6.4.
For 7.3/7.4, plea
Hi Thorsten,
Your answer bring me some more questions :)
Le 23/11/2022 à 17:15, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
Hi Sophie,
sophi wrote:
Will that stay as an extension or will it be integrated to
LibreOffice core?
There's currently no plans to do so, no. I don't think that is
technically desirable
Hi Sophie,
sophi wrote:
> Will that stay as an extension or will it be integrated to
> LibreOffice core?
>
There's currently no plans to do so, no. I don't think that is
technically desirable, since the implementation is
Java-only.
> Is everything (code comments, strings, doc) still in German?
>
Hi all!, hi Sophie,
There will be translation to english- see technical project info.
I will try to install wollmux, it does not work today.
If it works, ipost some examples.
Susanne
—
Susanne Mohn
> Am 23.11.2022 um 16:13 schrieb sophi :
>
> Hi Thorsten,
>
>> Le 23/11/202
Hi Thorsten,
Le 23/11/2022 à 12:12, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
Dear community,
as announced during LibOCon, and subsequently discussed in the ESC,
here's the formal adoption proposal for the "WollMux" template / form
letter / mail merge engine / Java extension, from the City of Munich.
For ref
; Samuel Mehrbrodt
; Björn Ranft
Betreff: [board-discuss] WollMux adoption proposal for The Document
Foundation
Dear community,
as announced during LibOCon, and subsequently discussed in the ESC, here's
the formal adoption proposal for the "WollMux" template / form letter / mail
merg
Dear community,
as announced during LibOCon, and subsequently discussed in the ESC,
here's the formal adoption proposal for the "WollMux" template / form
letter / mail merge engine / Java extension, from the City of Munich.
For reference, I attach the full proposal (so the initial version gets
ar
28 matches
Mail list logo
