[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13528859#comment-13528859
]
Hudson commented on BOOKKEEPER-491:
---
Integrated in bookkeeper-trunk #851 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13528858#comment-13528858
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-491:
-
Thanks for the update,
See https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-trunk/851/changes
Changes:
[fpj] BOOKKEEPER-491: Hedwig doc for configuration (fpj, sijie via fpj)
--
[...truncated 515 lines...]
A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13528900#comment-13528900
]
Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-497:
---
I think the fix thats there is fine.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13528916#comment-13528916
]
Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-497:
--
Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-497
Patch
See https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-trunk/852/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529029#comment-13529029
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-362:
-
[~hustlmsp]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529041#comment-13529041
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-55:
[~hustlmsp] Sounds good,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529170#comment-13529170
]
Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-205:
---
The issue is in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Flavio Junqueira updated BOOKKEEPER-495:
Attachment: BOOKKEEPER-495.diff
Forgot to save bookieConfigParams.textile, and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529190#comment-13529190
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-181:
-
My understanding of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529201#comment-13529201
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-500:
-
[~hustlmsp] You have marked
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yixue (Andrew) Zhu updated BOOKKEEPER-499:
--
Attachment: BOOKKEEPER-499.pdf
Message clock-vector version needs to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529212#comment-13529212
]
Yixue (Andrew) Zhu commented on BOOKKEEPER-499:
---
Hi Flavio,
Just saw
See https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-trunk/changes
See
https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-trunk/org.apache.bookkeeper$hedwig-server/854/
See https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-trunk/changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529282#comment-13529282
]
Hudson commented on BOOKKEEPER-495:
---
Integrated in bookkeeper-trunk #854 (See
Jiannan Wang created BOOKKEEPER-501:
---
Summary: Release topic does not close ledger causing unnecessary
fence
Key: BOOKKEEPER-501
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-501
Project:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8141/
---
(Updated Dec. 11, 2012, 10:13 p.m.)
Review request for bookkeeper.
Changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fangmin Lv updated BOOKKEEPER-463:
--
Attachment: BOOKKEEPER-463.patch
Attach a new patch according to Ivan's comments, changes:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529398#comment-13529398
]
Sijie Guo edited comment on BOOKKEEPER-365 at 12/11/12 10:23 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529492#comment-13529492
]
Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-205:
--
Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-205
Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529493#comment-13529493
]
Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-463:
--
Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-463
Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529632#comment-13529632
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-463:
--
[~lvfangmin] seems that the latest patch
Hello guys,
AckSet is introduced recently to resolve slow bookie issue. But the
semantic of 'writeQuorumSize' is not so clearly. What kind of goal we
should achieve for 'writeQuorumSize':
a) an entry is written to all 'writeQuorumSize' bookies eventually
b) just guarantee issuing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529650#comment-13529650
]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-500:
--
the users of BOOKKEEPER heavily reply on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529650#comment-13529650
]
Sijie Guo edited comment on BOOKKEEPER-500 at 12/12/12 6:09 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13529651#comment-13529651
]
Fangmin Lv commented on BOOKKEEPER-463:
---
Thanks sijie, I will rebase on the new
In my understanding, the semantics we provide is closer to your option b), but
not quite the way you put it. The contract is that upon an acknowledgement to a
request to add an entry, we guarantee that we have at least ackQuorumSize
copies stored in bookies. We send copies to more bookies
On the other hand, this is what the application asked us to do, so bk
should fulfill its commitment.
The key point here is client replaced the slow bookie with a brand new
bookie but not adding any entry to the new bookie for those ack'ed entries.
it already doesn't fulfill the commitment, so
When we replace a bookie, it won't do any work for previous entries, but it
will do for future entries. The case in which no more entries are added once a
bookie is replaced is a special case. I'm not sure if this is what you're
referring to.
In general, ops should remove slow bookies from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sijie Guo updated BOOKKEEPER-341:
-
Attachment: BOOKKEEPER-341.diff
Attach a patch adding a document for bookkeeper metadata
33 matches
Mail list logo