Re: [boost] Serialization Library Review

2002-11-11 Thread Mattias Flodin
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 09:07:40AM -0500, David Abrahams wrote: In this system, we use term serialization to mean a system where the current state of group of objects can be stored to a permanent medium that may outlast the current program execution. At any later time an equivalent

[boost] Re: pool benefit ratio for different compilers

2002-11-11 Thread Bohdan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:22602E7E3B92D411969B0090273CC28B1D235F;cecexchange.cec.jerviswebb.com... As John pointed out, you're not going to see much benefit (if any) when the standard library contains a pool allocator itself (as does STLport and glibc). All boost::pool library is

[boost] Re: function redesign for dynamic_any

2002-11-11 Thread Alexander Nasonov
Douglas Gregor wrote: On Monday 11 November 2002 08:32 am, Alexander Nasonov wrote: Additionally, two types of control are desired: 1) Control over real types of arguments. It is a limitation of dynamic_any library that arguments must be converted to _one_ type before a call. But they can be

[boost] Re: Proposed Boost Assert -- once again

2002-11-11 Thread Eric Woodruff
I've always used the examples out of TC++PL of some assertions: template typename Exception assertion (bool const condition) { if (!condition) { throw Exception (); } } template typename Exception assertion (bool const condition, Exception const exception) { if (!condition)

Re: [boost] BOOST_HAS_NRVO

2002-11-11 Thread David Abrahams
Daniel Frey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David Abrahams wrote: Daniel Frey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That was me, although I have no CVS write access Why don't we just fix that? What's your SourceForge UserID? dfrey42 Seems I have something to do for my 56K modem this evening - and I

Re: [boost] Boost.Bind testing patch for Sun

2002-11-11 Thread David Abrahams
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Even after applying other workarounds, the following patch seems to be required to get the Boost.Bind test to pass on the latest Sun compilers. Is it appropriate to apply this, or should this problem cause the

Re: [boost] boost::array and VC7 (oil water)

2002-11-11 Thread Douglas Paul Gregor
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote: I deleted the token BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME and nothing obvious happens I still get the same error(s) in my compile. ... or try replacing BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME with just typename. My experience with MSVC 6 is that it handles the typename

Re: [boost] Re: function queue

2002-11-11 Thread William E. Kempf
Eric Woodruff said: William, I'm not sure. I haven't been following the development branch, and don't know exactly how to access it. $ cvs co -r thread_development boost would check out the thread_development branch. Tweak as needed for your environment. I called this class a function

Re: [boost] Boost.Bind testing patch for Sun

2002-11-11 Thread David Abrahams
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Even after applying other workarounds, the following patch seems to be required to get the Boost.Bind test to pass on the latest Sun

Re: [boost] Re: Re: function queue

2002-11-11 Thread William E. Kempf
Eric Woodruff said: Yeah, it's the same concept. I had failed to distinguish thread_pool versus thread_group. Hopefully, adding the timeout and growing logic does not sacrifice the efficiency of the pool when it is full/has plenty to work on. Shouldn't be a large issue. If the pool is full

Re: [boost] iterator adaptors docs tid

2002-11-11 Thread David Abrahams
Yitzhak Sapir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In the iterator docs for generator_iterator: http://www.boost.org/libs/utility/generator_iterator.htm It says (under title The Generator Iterator Object Generator): template class Generator typename generator_iterator_generatorGenerator::type

Re: [boost] Re: function redesign for dynamic_any

2002-11-11 Thread Douglas Gregor
On Monday 11 November 2002 11:45 am, Alexander Nasonov wrote: This functionality can be usefull but not quite often. I think it's better to keep 'call' member function for simple use and introduce different name (call_ex?) for advanced use. So, you can use one of: // 1) templatetypename

Re: [boost] Re: function queue

2002-11-11 Thread Beman Dawes
At 12:56 PM 11/11/2002, William E. Kempf wrote: Eric Woodruff said: William, I'm not sure. I haven't been following the development branch, and don't know exactly how to access it. $ cvs co -r thread_development boost would check out the thread_development branch. Tweak as needed for your

[boost] config missing #define for Metrowerks compiler EH support

2002-11-11 Thread Alberto Barbati
Hi, would it be possible to add the following piece of code somewhere in boost\config\Metrowerks.hpp: - begin code #if !__option(exceptions) # define BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS #endif - end code I guess the code is self-explanatory. Alberto Barbati

[boost] Re: Re: Re: Property_map docs

2002-11-11 Thread Edward Diener
Jeremy Siek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:Pine.GSO.4.44.020951350.6135-10;zaphod.osl.iu.edu... Hi Edward, Since you feel so strongly about this, please write a new version of the property map docs and send them to me. In future emails, I would appreciate it if you refrained

[boost] Re: Re: Property_map docs

2002-11-11 Thread Ani Taggu
Edward Diener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:aqnhte$mml$1;main.gmane.org... Jeremy Siek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:Pine.GSO.4.44.021110230.4424-10;zaphod.osl.iu.edu... Hi Edward, On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Edward Diener wrote: eddiel OK, here are some questions

Re: [boost] boost::array and VC7 (oil vinegar...vinegarette!!)

2002-11-11 Thread Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
That worked!!! replacing BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME with typename At Monday 2002/11/11 10:58, you wrote: On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote: I deleted the token BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME and nothing obvious happens I still get the same error(s) in my compile. or try replacing

Re: [boost] boost::array and VC7 (oil vinegar...vinegarette!!)

2002-11-11 Thread David Abrahams
Victor A. Wagner, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That worked!!! replacing BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME with typename At Monday 2002/11/11 10:58, you wrote: On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote: I deleted the token BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME and nothing obvious happens I still get the

[boost] Re: Re: Property_map docs

2002-11-11 Thread Edward Diener
Ani Taggu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:aqpjsn$t89$1;main.gmane.org... Edward Diener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:aqnhte$mml$1;main.gmane.org... Jeremy Siek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:Pine.GSO.4.44.021110230.4424-10;zaphod.osl.iu.edu... Hi Edward,

[boost] Re: Re: Re: Property_map docs

2002-11-11 Thread Edward Diener
Christoph Kögl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:1037063128.2680.0.camel;localhost.localdomain... Hi Jeremy (and Edward), I am just now reading that unfortunate Edward Diener thread. Normally I am a quiet Boost list/code consumer, but this is the time, I think, to speak up (a little),