Is there any interest in a vector like container which is designed to make
working with raw memory easy. It is different from a vectorchar (with
the additional assumption that the objects are stored in memory
sequentially) is the following ways:
The integrator is defined to be a pointer to
hi ,
Do we have singleton class?
if we dont have that and think to have it - i'd designed one simple _singleton that
works good to make parameter class singleton..
regards,
Pintoo.
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
I have not tried to figure out where that increase comes from, but the
usual suspecs are regex, function and signal since that is what we use
most.
It shouldn't be regex: there have been a couple of minor patches and a
reorganization of the header directory structure, but no significant
I'm trying to use the more_io.zip stuff currently under review with a
copy of Metrowerks CodeWarrior Developement Studio (Mac OS X Edition,
v8). I haven't got anything to compile. I get errors like:
Based on the errors it looks to me like the compiler is being detected as
MSVC ? !
John.
I'm interested in something like this, but I am not sure if your
implementation meets the needs I often seem to have.
1. I very often am given a raw buffer by pointer and wish to acquire it into
a more RAII-like container without copying.
2. Also I would like to provide a customer deleter.
[Thomas Witt]
Pavols request is already in the queue. This has been done off list.
Ok, great - thanks for that.
[)o
IhIL..
___
Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Phil,
On Monday 03 March 2003 23:28, Phil Nash wrote:
This request seems to have been left up in the air. I know that many are
busy with the release schedule, and there is an identified shortage of
review managers, but it would have been nice to have at least acknowledged
this request
At 12:23 PM 3/2/2003, Jason House wrote:
I believe I've seen traffic earlier about some kind of upcoming deadline
for proposals for becoming part of the C++ standard.
There was a deadline yesterday (3 March) for papers to go in the
pre-meeting mailing, and there is another in April for final
At 08:55 PM 3/2/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
When I read a web page for a project (in this case, HTML-Tidy at
http://tidy.sourceforge.net), I noticed that they built/tested their
library every day automatically with computers SourceForge leaves for
automation. Maybe we should use those computer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff,
Jeff Garland wrote:
|Phil,
|
|On Monday 03 March 2003 23:28, Phil Nash wrote:
|
|This request seems to have been left up in the air. I know that many are
|busy with the release schedule, and there is an identified shortage of
|review managers,
At 06:45 PM 3/1/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The tag is RC_1_30_0
Didn't we agree that we were going to tag the trunk and generally do
any merges from the trunk to the branch? This tag appears to be on
the branch AFAICT.
OK, I've now gone back and read the
At 04:01 PM 3/3/2003, Mark Rodgers wrote:
Is it time we introduced beta releases into the release procedure? It
seems to me that it would be a good idea to tar up 1.30.0 RC and give
everyone a chance to try it out and report feedback without having to
use CVS. I know CVS puts me off.
Questions
At 10:03 AM 3/3/2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I see that when upgrading LyX to use the upcomming 1.30.0 release
instead of the 1.29.0 release our binary size increases by more than
125kB...
Not sure what goes into your binary size. Does that include source code,
tests, examples, and docs?
At 02:03 AM 3/4/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
I'm trying to use the more_io.zip stuff currently under review with a
copy of Metrowerks CodeWarrior Developement Studio (Mac OS X Edition,
v8). I haven't got anything to compile.
If there is a question of configuration as John's rely indicates, a good
No one disagreed with this assessment.
Jeff Garland posts a partially updated set of developer procedures:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/1411802/release_procedures.htm
At this point the discussion fragments into details and corner cases. The
updated release_procedures.htm
Thanks. That worked.
Douglas Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 03 March 2003 05:03 pm, Marc Jacobs wrote:
bind( X::f, x, _1 )( 6 ); // error!
You can't pass rvalues to boost::bind function objects, because of the
forwarding problem in C++. If you
Beman Dawes wrote:
At 04:01 PM 3/3/2003, Mark Rodgers wrote:
Is it time we introduced beta releases into the release procedure?
It seems to me that it would be a good idea to tar up 1.30.0 RC and
give everyone a chance to try it out and report feedback without
having to use CVS. I know
I'm trying to use a member function as a callback to a C-style library. I've
got the bind working by itself, but the resulting function object does not
convert to the type required by the library. Clearly a boost::bind object is
not a simple function pointer and the type is being checked by the
Hi Jeremy,
I'm just profiling some algorithm. I noticed that dijkstra_shortest_paths
takes about 30% more time when predecessors and distance are
stored in vector_property_map that I've just wrote. The only potential
problem is shared_ptr member in that class, and in fact, it's copy ctor is
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 10:02 am, Marc Jacobs wrote:
I'm trying to use a member function as a callback to a C-style library.
I've got the bind working by itself, but the resulting function object does
not convert to the type required by the library. Clearly a boost::bind
object is not a
Alisdair Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears the current borland compiler has several problems when
linking with the dyanmic version of the RTL, most noticably (in boost
regressions) wrt std::numeric limits. These problems go away when
linking
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| At 10:03 AM 3/3/2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| I see that when upgrading LyX to use the upcomming 1.30.0 release
| instead of the 1.29.0 release our binary size increases by more than
| 125kB...
|
| Not sure what goes into your binary size. Does
templatetypename T,T* p,void (T::*f)(int)
void callback(int i) { (p-*f)(i); }
At 08:02 AM 3/4/2003, Marc Jacobs wrote:
I'm trying to use a member function as a callback to a C-style library. I've
got the bind working by itself, but the resulting function object does not
convert to the type
Hi,
Since I did not see a response, I would like to post this reminder to make
sure that authors did not miss my review and all issues brought are
discussed before the library is added to the boost main trunk.
Gennadiy.
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
Jason House wrote:
Well, I know that in MSVC simply refuses to use strings as template
parameters... If this truly is illegal by the standard, then a string
template parameter could default to a type for that string. As far as
use in other places, maybe use of some keyword as a function.
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 03:12 AM, Aashit Soni wrote:
Do we have singleton class?
if we dont have that and think to have it - i'd designed one simple
_singleton that works good to make parameter class singleton..
I've done much work with singletons, and I've come around to the
opinion that
At 01:10 PM 3/4/2003, Jason House wrote:
James Curran wrote:
Both the Standard MSVC6 allow a (const char*) as a template parameter.
What is rejected (by both) is a text literal parameter. For a non-type
parameter, the value must be a constant across all translation units linked
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 12:24 PM, Larry Evans wrote:
Brian Gray wrote:
A raw memory buffer is a good idea. I've rolled my own on a couple
of occasions, but never tried to mimic the style of the STL. That
approach opens up a couple issues:
Since we don't know what's stored in the memory
Further to my previous vote for acceptance of this package,
I would like to suggest that the rationale should give some more detail on
WHY this is useful
compared, for example, with
'\n' or \nAnd More or const char nl = '\n' or making nl a function
nl().
and WHEN newl and endl should be
Jason House wrote:
If I understand correctly, each file that uses SomeClassMyParam
will compile in its own version of SomeClass. Will a compiler remove
the duplicate versions and leave only one copy of SomeClassMyParam?
I believe that would be a Quality of Implementation issue. A
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 21:44, Louis Lavery wrote:
[I'm cross posting this to the main list as it contains some discussion
wrt. BGL in general as well]
I've got it sorted now after having another look at the BGL code,
and having made my own version of undirected_dfs...
In an algorithm I'm
Mr. Alexandrescu has an impressive singleton class template in Loki and
explained in Modern C++ Design.
Aashit Soni wrote:
hi ,
Do we have singleton class?
if we dont have that and think to have it - i'd designed one simple
_singleton that works good to make parameter class singleton..
Gennadiy,
I actually began a lengthy reply but my mail program crashed. I'm am too
busy with other work right now to start over, I'll have to reply later in
the week.
However, please know that I have carefully read your review and plan to
reply soon.
Thanks,
Eric
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Hi,
Beman Dawes wrote:
At 04:01 PM 3/3/2003, Mark Rodgers wrote:
How many extra people would be encourage to test the beta?
Good question. Are there others interested in a beta?
I'd love to see beta releases (ZIP'd packaged like a full release).
-cd
In most part design of the library looks solid and well thought-out( I
think
we definitely ought to give Andrei credits for this also).
By the way, any chance to tweak the acknowledgments a bit. They mention
GenericProgramming: Discriminated Unions Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. C/C++
Users Journal.
Brian Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can see how vectorDerived* might benefit from conversion to
vectorBase*, but we're talking about contiguous memory here. Very
subject to raw object size, so there's no way to cast between the two
and preserve object
Paul A. Bristow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Reporting including title) Sorry. Paul
This looks most interesting, and there most definitely remains a
great need for
a units handling package.
snip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip entire quoted message
Paul,
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 05:36 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Brian Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can see how vectorDerived* might benefit from conversion to
vectorBase*, but we're talking about contiguous memory here. Very
subject to raw object size, so
Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
The second problem however is a property of the DFS algorithm where a
starting vertex is given that I had overlooked. After the DFS has
discovered all the vertices reachable from the starting vertex, it will
continue using any yet undiscovered (white) vertices and use
39 matches
Mail list logo
