In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Beman
Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>At 03:40 PM 3/17/2003, Terje Slettebø wrote:
>>
>>BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM
>>BOOST_NO_STD_WSTRING
>>BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T
>
>Are you sure disabling wide character support is really the solution, or
>that it is really fully d
There are gcc 2.96 (Redhat 7.3) compilation error for
boost/libs/python/test/opaque.cpp:
http://cci.lbl.gov/~rwgk/tmp/rc_1_30_0_opaque_fail.txt
More recent gcc's don't seems to suffer from this problem.
I am not sure this is important enough to delay the release any further.
David?
Ralf
__
I've just checked in a small patch to address this warning:
cc-1460 CC: WARNING File = boost/boost/test/detail/wrap_stringstream.hpp, Line
= 90
Function function "boost::wrap_stringstream::str" is redeclared "inline"
after
being called.
wrap_stringstream::str()
Thanks for that.
Malcolm Smith
Analyst Programmer
Comvision Pty Ltd
http://www.comvision.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Douglas Paul Gregor
Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2003 15:07
To: Boost mailing list
Subject: RE: [boost] Re: Re: Regex and
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Malcolm Smith wrote:
> I've been to http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/ but 1.30.0 is not listed
> (or I'm blind). Where is the beta ?
Carefully hidden here :)
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/boost_1_30_0_b1.zip
Doug
___
I've been to http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/ but 1.30.0 is not listed
(or I'm blind). Where is the beta ?
Malcolm Smith
Analyst Programmer
Comvision Pty Ltd
http://www.comvision.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Edward Diener
Sent:
"Chris Trengove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think you can get rid of the compilation error just be qualifying the use
> of "value". For example,
>
>typedef X::type type;
>
> I have recently been attempting to port Boost.Python to BCC and have come
> across lots of examples of this. The co
"Alisdair Meredith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Several of the boost libraries select functionality based on the result
> of some compile-time test. The result is usually stored in a
> BOOST_STATIC_CONST( bool, test::value );
>
> The current Borland compiler does
I have received an inquiry asking for a list of companies that are
using Boost to develop commercial software. If your company is using
Boost libraries in its products and is willing to have it be known,
I'd appreciate it if you post something or send me a private email to
that effect.
Thanks in
Malcolm Smith wrote:
> I cannot find 1.30. Where ?
The 1.30 release is the upcoming one but one could download it from
SourceForge as a beta. I thought you might be trying that.
Evidently you are building with 1.29 or earlier. I don't see any STLPMT.LIB
in the bcb5.mak so you are picking it up f
I cannot find 1.30. Where ?
I may have not used an explicit path for the MAKE operation. I will rebuild
it again.
Thanks.
Malcolm Smith
Analyst Programmer
Comvision Pty Ltd
http://www.comvision.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Edward D
Malcolm Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I just compiled the regex library under C++Builder 5.
>
> I've tried to compile an application and it complains about not being
> able
> to find STLPMT.LIB - I can find no information on this LIB.
It's a BCB6 library for the stlPort implementation of the C++ st
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 8:32 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
At 02:24 AM 3/13/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
4. My testing was with a stock Boost 1.29.0 from a zip file. If the
CVS version of Boost already has fixes for CW-DS and/or CWP8.3, I'll
switch to that and apologize for wasting everyone's t
Additionally, this LIB is referenced in the LIB/DLL produced by the BCB5.MAK
file supplied with boost.
Malcolm Smith
Analyst Programmer
Comvision Pty Ltd
http://www.comvision.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Beman Dawes
Sent: Tuesday, 18
Strange. I've been using C++Builder (1-6) for YEARS and never come across
it. I'll check further.
Malcolm Smith
Analyst Programmer
Comvision Pty Ltd
http://www.comvision.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Beman Dawes
Sent: Tuesday, 18 Marc
At 06:51 PM 3/17/2003, Malcolm Smith wrote:
>I just compiled the regex library under C++Builder 5.
>
>I've tried to compile an application and it complains about not being
able
>to find STLPMT.LIB - I can find no information on this LIB.
That's not a Boost library. It's a Borland library. On my
Hi all,
I just compiled the regex library under C++Builder 5.
I've tried to compile an application and it complains about not being able
to find STLPMT.LIB - I can find no information on this LIB.
Help ?
Malcolm Smith
Analyst Programmer
Comvision Pty Ltd
http://www.comvision.org
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Daniel Frey wrote:
Still looks broken over here:
http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1047901021/dailylog_win32_vc60
I think it's OK to revert the patch to get 1.30.0 out,
Which patch? John said the changes that caused the disturbance were
never intended to be checked in.
At 05:01 PM 3/17/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>> The patch to is_class would work if is_function could be called with
>> a reference, so I think it's worth to consider fixing is_function. As
>> John is the expert, I think he can decide whether it's better to wait
>> for the SourceForge-folks to
>From: "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 03:40 PM 3/17/2003, Terje Slettebø wrote:
>
> >Well, I think this reinforces the suggestion to define
> >BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM
> >for 2.95.x. Comments?
> >
> >Either that, or to have some way to detect where
> std::basic_stringstream<>
> >is not
>From: "Jason House" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Terje Slettebø wrote:
> > typedef std::vector vector_char;
> >
> > vector_char values;
> >
> > // Fill with 'A', 'B', 'C'
> >
> > std::cout << io::format("[", "]", ", ", "\'", "\'") <<
values;
> >
> > Output:
> >
> > ['A', 'B', 'C']
> >
> > However, is th
Daniel Frey wrote:
> > Still looks broken over here:
> >
> > http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1047901021/dailylog_win32_vc60
>
> I think it's OK to revert the patch to get 1.30.0 out,
Which patch? John said the changes that caused the disturbance were
never intended to be checked in.
> but fo
At 03:40 PM 3/17/2003, Terje Slettebø wrote:
>Well, I think this reinforces the suggestion to define
>BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM
>for 2.95.x. Comments?
>
>Either that, or to have some way to detect where
std::basic_stringstream<>
>is not supported, and turn off wide character support for that, in
>lex
At 12:27 PM 3/17/2003, Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
>
>
>Jeff Garland ha escrito:
>
>> > OK, so how I ask for preliminary review? Posting a mail here?
>>
>> Yes, you can just ask for preliminary feedback on this list.
>> Another thing you can do is put the code in the boost-sandbox.
>> This helps
>From: "Gennaro Prota" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:47:20 +0300, Vladimir Prus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >Gennaro Prota wrote:
> >
> >>>Ok. I've forwarded this to Kevlin.
> >>
> >> Maybe there's more than one problem here. I see that Vladimir talks
> >> about warnings while
Jeff Garland ha escrito:
> > OK, so how I ask for preliminary review? Posting a mail here?
>
> Yes, you can just ask for preliminary feedback on this list.
> Another thing you can do is put the code in the boost-sandbox.
> This helps get things into the boost structure and allows other
> booster
David Abrahams wrote:
"Andreas Huber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Still looks broken over here:
http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1047901021/dailylog_win32_vc60
I think it's OK to revert the patch to get 1.30.0 out, but for the
future, I think we should keep in mind that it's actually is_function
At 07:17 AM 3/17/2003, Thomas Witt wrote:
>the library name is still "fs". I was under the impression that this was
>only temporary and should be changed to a more boost compatible
>"boost_filesystem" before release. From a pratical point of view "fs"
>seems like begging for a nameclash.
Good poin
Terje Slettebø wrote:
> typedef std::vector vector_char;
>
> vector_char values;
>
> // Fill with 'A', 'B', 'C'
>
> std::cout << io::format("[", "]", ", ", "\'", "\'") << values;
>
> Output:
>
> ['A', 'B', 'C']
>
> However, is this overkill?
It seems that way, especially considering that
At 08:16 AM 3/17/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>Still looks broken over here:
>
>http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1047901021/dailylog_win32_vc60
We are still waiting for SourceForge to clear an errant lock. It can't be
fixed until then.
--Beman
___
Unsu
At 07:14 AM 3/17/2003, John Maddock wrote:
>* [Boost.Regex] [PATCH] Fix GCC 3.3 warnings from Lars Gullik Bjønnes.
>Awaiting response from John Maddock.
>(Since this one just eliminates warnings, the release won't be held
>for it.)
>
>That one will have to wait - gcc 3.3 hasn't been re
"Gennaro Prota" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [...]
> What monster are you creating, man? :-)
I must be the only one here that actually writes application code,
because it never ceases to amaze me how everyone else can follow
all these neat and tidy rules for writin
> OK, so how I ask for preliminary review? Posting a mail here?
Yes, you can just ask for preliminary feedback on this list.
Another thing you can do is put the code in the boost-sandbox.
This helps get things into the boost structure and allows other
boosters to keep up with changes as the lib
"Andreas Huber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Beman & John,
>
>> Both the main trunk and RC_1_30_0 are working fine for me as of Sunday 6PM
>> US Eastern time.
>
> Douglas Gregor has already fixed the is_class.hpp problem, please see
>
> http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg45230.php
>
>>
"John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| * [Boost.Regex] [PATCH] Fix GCC 3.3 warnings from Lars Gullik Bjønnes.
| Awaiting response from John Maddock.
| (Since this one just eliminates warnings, the release won't be held
| for it.)
|
| That one will have to wait - gcc 3.3 hasn't b
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:47:20 +0300, Vladimir Prus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Gennaro Prota wrote:
>
>>>Ok. I've forwarded this to Kevlin.
>>
>> Maybe there's more than one problem here. I see that Vladimir talks
>> about warnings while Jeff about errors. Also maybe it helps to see the
>> exact c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Beman,
the library name is still "fs". I was under the impression that this was
only temporary and should be changed to a more boost compatible
"boost_filesystem" before release. From a pratical point of view "fs"
seems like begging for a nameclash.
Th
* [Boost.Regex] [PATCH] Fix GCC 3.3 warnings from Lars Gullik Bjønnes.
Awaiting response from John Maddock.
(Since this one just eliminates warnings, the release won't be held
for it.)
That one will have to wait - gcc 3.3 hasn't been released yet anyway.
* [type_traits] is_class.hpp p
Gennaro Prota wrote:
>>Ok. I've forwarded this to Kevlin.
>
> Maybe there's more than one problem here. I see that Vladimir talks
> about warnings while Jeff about errors. Also maybe it helps to see the
> exact condition to define BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM in
> config/stdlib/sgi.hpp, with the comment
At 10:40 PM 3/16/2003, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
>Could this patch be accepted in time for 1.30.0? I asked yesterday for a
>fix to array.hpp that allows it to be used when exceptions are disabled,
>and this looks legit to me.
The change looks innocuous to me. Would anyone object if I go ahead an
apply
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:35:11 +0100, Terje Slettebø
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>From: "Vladimir Prus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I don't have much to say, but lexical_cast was broken just now. My code
>which
>> was compiling a week ago and wasn't changed since now produces the same
>> warning, after
At 01:38 AM 3/17/2003, Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote:
>I finally got simple_ls to compile and link.
>
>The build now correctly builds two libraries (one release, one debug) and
>if you point to the right place (shouldn't there be some way to marshall
>the libraries instead of leaving them scattere
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:47:57 -0600, "David B. Held"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Gennaro Prota" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [...]
>> I don't know if it's useful or not but it's certainly usable. The fact
>> that deduction fails in your case doesn't mean it fails
jeff ha escrito:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:07:54 -0600, David B. Held wrote
>
> > I'd say 6 or 7 people expressing interest is more than enough to justify
> > Boostifying the code at this stage.
>
> I agree. Since you have written an article which clearly describes
> the concept and provides an
>From: "Vladimir Prus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Terje Slettebø wrote:
>
> > > /home/boost/boost-regress/boost/boost/lexical_cast.hpp:173: syntax
error
> > > before `;'
> >
> > Looking at the CVS, it appears the reason for this is that
> > config/compiler/gcc.hpp no longer defines BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREA
Terje Slettebø wrote:
> > /home/boost/boost-regress/boost/boost/lexical_cast.hpp:173: syntax error
> > before `;'
>
> Looking at the CVS, it appears the reason for this is that
> config/compiler/gcc.hpp no longer defines BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM, even
> though it should, at least for 2.95.x and below
46 matches
Mail list logo
