On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:53:28AM -0700, Jeff Garland wrote:
> [snip]
> Ok will do. I'll add some protections or rounding for when durations
> support higher than microsecond resolution. I'll let you know when
> this gets added.
It seems that since 1) timeval is non-(C++) standard, and 2) it is
NetBSD does not have WCHAR_MIN/MAX using gcc3.3 basicaly the min/max for
wchar_t is INT_MIN/MAX similarly to freeBSD
I encountered this problem when trying to compile boost.python which
failed because of this problem.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes:
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniel Frey
| Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:44 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: [boost] RE: Math constants - efficiency
|
|
| On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:54:36 +0200, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
|
| > These are
Aleksey Gurtovoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Eric Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I'd apply the patch myself, but due to the heavy use of preprocessed
>> > headers, I'm worried I won't get it completely right. So I'll leave
>> > it up to Aleksey (or others)
Chris,
Sorry for the long delay, I was swamped with other stuff.
The longer I think about your suggestions about FSM protocols the more do I
think that coded FSM protocol specifications are not worth the effort. Even
worse, I believe they will inevitably lead to code duplication. However,
since I
Hi Vladimir,
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> There's another question: why store "u" at all. I'm
> guessing "source(*ei, g)" might be more efficient?
That's a good thought, but there might be a problem
trying to dereference a past-the-end iterator. I
mentioned before that ei_end could always be generated
Hi there,
I just checked out the latest CVS and I am having trouble building it.
My environment is:
- Windows XP
- Intel Version 7.1, Build 20030402Z
- Visual C++ 7.0
All my environment variables are setup correctly (INCLUDE, LIB, MSVCDIR,
INTEL_PATH, PATH). The command line I am using with bja
Hello,
Since this is my first posting to the Boost List, let me first say
thanks for Boost. It looks like a great resource! My first use of
Boost will be the date_time library, followed by the file_system
library.
Now, the reason for my posting. I am using MSVC 7.0 and am unable to
compile the
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 17:56:51 +0200, Gennaro Prota wrote:
> Yes. Just to stimulate discussion, and without any offence towards
> Daniel's solution, this is an approach without the conversion function
> and the operator overloads. Beware that it's completely untested.
>
> [snip]
>
> It's not so "ad
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:54:36 +0200, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> These are interesting results, but my enthusiasm is severely reduced by
> the fact that MSVC 7.1 (Standard) chokes terminally on both versions
> :-((
>
> Compiling...
> Frey_bench_mark_gcc.cpp
> Frey_bench_mark_gcc.cpp(82) : warning C43
These are interesting results, but my enthusiasm is severely reduced by the fact
that MSVC 7.1 (Standard) chokes terminally on both versions :-((
Compiling...
Frey_bench_mark_gcc.cpp
Frey_bench_mark_gcc.cpp(82) : warning C4305: 'return' : truncation from 'double'
to 'float'
Frey_bench_mark_gcc.cpp
Jeff Garland wrote:
Ok will do. I'll add some protections or rounding for when durations
support higher than microsecond resolution. I'll let you know when
this gets added.
Thanks a lot !
Stefan
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org
Support Requests item #759244, was opened at 2003-06-23 17:09
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=207586&aid=759244&group_id=7586
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolut
S. Seefeld wrote
> I'd suggest these two converters to be added:
>
> timeval to_timeval(const ptime &t)
>...
>
> timeval to_timeval(const time_duration &d)
>...
>
> the latter is especially useful as select() operates with durations,
> so there is no need to convert between 1970-01-01 relative
Bugs item #759218, was opened at 2003-06-23 16:31
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=107586&aid=759218&group_id=7586
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Pr
Terje Slettebø wrote:
From: "Daniel Frey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 22:01:19 +0200, Terje Slettebø wrote:
Another thing, are the ADD_OPERATOR macro in your code necessary? It
compiles fine without it on Intel C++ 7.1.
The GCC doesn't work without the operators, as it doesn't implici
Jeff Garland wrote:
I'd like to replace my code by boost::date_time, but conversion
from boost::date_time to timeval doesn't seem to be supported.
You are right, but this would make a nice addition.
I'd suggest these two converters to be added:
timeval to_timeval(const ptime &t)
{
ptime timet
David Abrahams wrote:
> Eric Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'd apply the patch myself, but due to the heavy use of preprocessed
> > headers, I'm worried I won't get it completely right. So I'll leave
> > it up to Aleksey (or others) to fix.
>
> AFAICT, Aleksey is the only one who kno
Eric Friedman wrote:
> Aleksey (and all),
>
> In working on porting boost::variant to Borland, I've come across some
> trouble with a bug in the compiler.
>
> Specfically, I'm getting "Cannot have both a template class and
> function named 'bind1st'" and similarly for bind2nd. I know other MPL
> h
"John Torjo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When creating the STATIC_CONSTANTs, was "|" what was meant, or was "||"
> meant to be there, like this:
> BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(
> bool, is_input_or_output_iter
> =
> (boost::is_convertible::value
> ||
> boost::is_co
> Comments?
Sounds reasonably to me, but I admit that I don't really understand POSIX
filesystems. I guess what I really wanted was something that would be
equivalent to "rm -f file", remember that we already have the equivalent to
"rm -r path". Of course I don't know how one would implement th
- Original Message -
From: "Pavel Vozenilek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:38 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT - a little better
>
> "John Torjo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I wa
Hi,
Here's some code for the validator class, in iterator_adaptors.hpp:
// line 741
// This is really a partial concept check for iterators. Should it
// be moved or done differently?
template
struct validator
{
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(
bool, is_input_or_output_iter
I've run into a problem using sandbox::boost/sequence_algo/algorithm.hpp.
The header uses "boost::find", but that function can't really be used,
because:
1. (minor) it depends on new iterator adaptors, while I'm using sandbox with
boost CVS.
2. It's not possible to use boost::find, since, as
I added another test file for the I/O-state saving classes. It's in
the main Boost CVS as "boost/libs/io/test/ios_state_unit_test.cpp".
I have two compilers installed (GCC 3.1 and CodeWarrior 8). I wrote
and tested the new file with CodeWarrior. But my GCC doesn't support
the wchar_t part of
Hi Bruce,
Bruce Barr wrote:
> I'm glad Vladimir got me to take another look at this.
> I'm submitting a new patch to replace the one
> submitted on May 30.
And I'm glad you're willing to polish your patch!
> There are other differences between the recursive and
> nonrecursive versions that, in
Hi,
> Ah... the problem is that those new additions are not documented, AFAICT ;-)
> It makes it a little bit hard to understand the interface, especially since
> there are no examples/tests for split functionality.
Well, as I said, this stuff is quite new, documentation will follow soon, pleas
27 matches
Mail list logo
