David Abrahams wrote:
I'm trying to get a grip on what facilities are available for doing
linear algebra with uBlas, but I can't seem to find any good
information. I'm interested in such things as:
LU factorization
Cholesky factorization
Gaussian Elimination
Ordinary Least Squares Regressi
Hi again,
Discussing a library in Boost is a most exhausting task, but a most
rewarding one too. After suggestions from Fernando, Beman,
Jeremy and others, I've made many significant improvements to
multiindex_set, now renamed to indexed_set. You can download
it, along with a test suite and prelim
Hi,
I'm trying to get a grip on what facilities are available for doing
linear algebra with uBlas, but I can't seem to find any good
information. I'm interested in such things as:
LU factorization
Cholesky factorization
Gaussian Elimination
Ordinary Least Squares Regression
...etc...
At 11:21 AM 7/19/2003, Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote:
>At Saturday 2003-07-19 07:24, you wrote:
>>I've added the entry below to the Boost.Threads bibliography page in
CVS.
>>I also added the Wirth quote to the FAQ: "semaphores ... are not
suitable
>>for higher level languages."
>
>
>
>Wirth also de
At 08:44 PM 7/19/2003, Misha Bergal wrote:
>"Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Years ago I worked on some general business applications involving
liquid
>> inventories dealing in tank dimensions, gallons, coefficients of
>expansion,
>> and all sorts of ot
John Madsen wrote:
Starting from the smart_ptr headers (shared, scoped, and weak), I've created
corresponding handle classes. The motivation is to provide RAII semantics for
handle based resources. Windows' HANDLEs, FILE*s, and file descriptors are the
most obvious examples.
Being primaril
--- Edward Diener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it really so hard for a library implementor, who has made changes in how
> his library works between releases, to write a paragraph or a page
> explaining the change(s) in functionality so that others can see where the
> library is going and what
Inline.
"John Madsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> If you can convince most of the people on this list to provide an
automatic
> conversion, more power to you. I still maintain that avoiding hard to
diagnose
> errors is worth much more than saving 6 characters o
Inline.
"John Torjo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Using operator->() and operator*() you use "pointer value itself". It is
> > pretty rare situation when you need it directly and not as part of
> > abc->def() or *abc constructs. Example of c_str() is irreleva
Gregory Colvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday, Jul 19, 2003, at 20:52 America/Denver, Ross Smith wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 20 July 2003 11:46, Gregory Colvin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> There are no Powers That Be. Boost has no policy-based smart
>>> pointers because nobody has done the difficult jo
>
> Using operator->() and operator*() you use "pointer value itself". It is
> pretty rare situation when you need it directly and not as part of
> abc->def() or *abc constructs. Example of c_str() is irrelevant --- you
can
> do all string manipulations without c_str(). The former is needed to
> in
> Alan Bellingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>did they give you the name of this library?
> >
> > Presumably this is WTL - the Windows Template Library.
>
> That's the one.
> --
I've used it and it's great!
I hated MFC for a long time, WTL is indeed cool!
And as far as I know it's develop
Hi Peter,
>
> If a compiler has a current function facility but is not currently
supported
> by current_function.hpp, if you show '(unknown)' users of this compiler
will
> spot the problem and submit a patch, or at least report it to us.
>
> If not, they may not even realize that the library could
> I read all of the previous discussion of this on the boost list and did
not
> find any good arguments against mine.
> 1) Pointer specific features have been removed for smart_handle. Both
> implicit and explicit type coercion features are gone as are operators *
and ->.
I do not see anything w
David Abrahams wrote:
> Aleksey Gurtovoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Any reason you cannot use
> >
http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/resources/cvs_RC_1_30_0/developer_summary_page.html?
>
> None, in particular. This table is a little weird though:
>
>
http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/
15 matches
Mail list logo
