E. Gladyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Bohdan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you mean your threads snipped: Yes i've seen it.
IMO it is more complicated and YES it has compile
time problems, unless you put traits implementation
in cpp files and move
--- Bohdan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Finally your lib may become non-template ( i mean
cpp files) ...
If it becomes not-template, I'll stop working on it
:). cpp files are allowed for the layer 1 code and
compilation-time optimization wrappers only, that's
it! Both has little to do with the
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
BTW, I have a question:
According to BCB, the primary swap is hidden when some swap is
declared directly in std even for ADL.
That is, not even this works:
using std::swap; swap(x,y);
is this conformant?
Yes, declaring things in std is undefined behavior.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philippe,
could you please contact me in case you are still interested in
shifted_ptr being reviewed.
TIA
Thomas
BOOST Review Wizard.
- --
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet
Hannover
voice:
Hi John, Hi .*,
Given that I have a string 's' from somewhere, I'd like to create a
regular expression where some part must match that string. The problem
is, the 's' could contain characters that have a special meaning in
regular expressions. Is there some support function that can provide an
Hi all,
I've tried to use the variant library to implement some new
functionality inside the Boost.Spirit library. I must say, I'm
impressed. Very well done!
I've stumbled over a problem though: gcc (Cygwin: gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020927
(prerelease)) reports:
In file included from
From: Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:53 PM 8/6/2003, Russell Hind wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
I don't think people were against the idea of solving the problem, but
rather there is a need for a unified prefix/suffix header solution
such
as John is suggesting. Developers need a
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 01:13 PM 8/5/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 11:27 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
Alisdair Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
version.hpp still claims to be version 1.30.0
Oh well. I guess there are some details
Peter Dimov wrote:
The main problem with shared_ptr 1.30.x and below is that the single- and
multithreaded versions are incompatible. The CVS version is now binary
compatible on Windows, so 1.31 will work across different threading
models; still, the correct default for Borland should probably be
Is there documentation anywhere that explains how to build and link graphviz
for MSVC .NET for use with the BOOST graph library?
I am trying to compile the example ospf-example.cpp from the BOOST graph
library in MSVC .NET. I am using BOOST 1.30.0. I built the graphviz library
using bjam with the
E. Gladyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Sorry, you are wrong. This discussion subjects were
the link problem and be able to to use boost::thread
with my toy OS and/or with different threading models
without mocking with boost sources.
Now i see. I
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 03:59 PM 8/5/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Why are we using such a cryptic namespace name? I mean, I can
understand wanting to abbreviate template_metaprogramming, but
filesystem doesn't seem too bad and you could use filesys; people
will use
Bohdan wrote:
[...]
There are a lot of good reasons why we would not always want to have
total control.
Not always means sometimes not ?
According to this logic your gui language is
layer built on top of interface proposed by me
... just for convenience. Right ?
I looks like a
Bugs item #784698, was opened at 2003-08-07 04:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=107586aid=784698group_id=7586
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Brock Peabody [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That sounds good. What if we called the lower layer
boost::gui and the
upper layer boost::sgtl?
It stands for 'standard'. Maybe that's a little pretentious for us at
this early stage :) gtl would probably be
David Abrahams wrote:
void create_directories( const path ph );
Precondition: ph.empty() ||
forall p: p == ph || is_parent(p, ph): is_directory(p) || !exists( p )
Postcondition: exists(ph) is_directory(ph)
void establish_directory( const path ph );
has the right mix of
At 02:10 PM 8/7/2003, Joerg Walter wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Monitor inspection report to verify problems are being dealt with.
Unsure about that. I remember some mails from a wizard ;-)
Yes, but the release manager has to help too. Or at least
--- Gregory Colvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps Perseus, who slew the Medusa, the
snake-haired monster of
so frightful an aspect that no living thing could
behold her without
being turned into stone.
Perseus avoid being turned to stone by clever use of
indirection --
he avoided
--- Brock Peabody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What about simple boost::gui ?
I would like to have an unique name without the
boost
prefix.
I think the boost namespace is a requirement for any
boost library.
Sorry, I didn't mean to put the library out of the
boost namespace. The
--- Drazen DOTLIC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that the interest for this kind of library has
been shown (or not,
whatever) could the interested parties please
coordinate their efforts
using other means than boost mailing list? IIUC this
list is for issues
with existing code (problems,
I am sorry but I am having trouble following the discussion; it is spreaded
everywhere in my newsreader recursively.
What is the new name you have finally found? I would like to suggest adding
an adjective or symbol that represents something clean and / or efficient
with hidden features
On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 11:27 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
Alisdair Meredith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
version.hpp still claims to be version 1.30.0
Oh well. I guess there are some details missing from the release
manager's responsibilities on the release procedure page.
Can you (or Beman,
22 matches
Mail list logo
