On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 11:27 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
Alisdair Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
version.hpp still claims to be version 1.30.0
Oh well. I guess there are some details missing from the release
manager's responsibilities on the release procedure page.
Can you (or Beman,
I am sorry but I am having trouble following the discussion; it is spreaded
everywhere in my newsreader recursively.
What is the new name you have finally found? I would like to suggest adding
an adjective or symbol that represents something clean and / or efficient
with hidden features (secondar
--- Douglas Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The allocator design focused on the benefits one
> could get from specialized
> allocators for containers, e.g., data structures
> that may allocate large
> chunks of memory that are expected to be used
> together. They don't really
> give us much f
--- Drazen DOTLIC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that the interest for this kind of library has
> been shown (or not,
> whatever) could the interested parties please
> coordinate their efforts
> using other means than boost mailing list? IIUC this
> list is for issues
> with existing code (probl
--- Brock Peabody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > > What about simple boost::gui ?
> >
> > I would like to have an unique name without the
> boost
> > prefix.
>
> I think the boost namespace is a requirement for any
> boost library.
Sorry, I didn't mean to put the library out of the
boost n
--- Gregory Colvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps Perseus, who slew the Medusa, the
> snake-haired monster of
> "so frightful an aspect that no living thing could
> behold her without
> being turned into stone."
>
> Perseus avoid being turned to stone by clever use of
> indirection --
> he
At 02:10 PM 8/7/2003, Joerg Walter wrote:
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * Monitor inspection report to verify problems are being dealt with.
>
>Unsure about that. I remember some mails from a wizard ;-)
Yes, but the release manager has to help too. O
David Abrahams wrote:
void create_directories( const path & ph );
Precondition: ph.empty() ||
forall p: p == ph || is_parent(p, ph): is_directory(p) || !exists( p )
Postcondition: exists(ph) && is_directory(ph)
void establish_directory( const path & ph );
has the right mix of
"E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Do you mean there will be two libraries/layers ?
>
> I suggest for you take a look at some other posts in
> this thread on the library layers. Let me know if you
> cann't fine them.
>
Thanks. I'm already tracking this
"Brock Peabody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> That sounds good. What if we called the lower layer
> > >> boost::gui and the
> > >> upper layer boost::sgtl?
>
> It stands for 'standard'. Maybe that's a little pretentious for us at
> this early stage :) gtl wo
Bugs item #784698, was opened at 2003-08-07 04:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=107586&aid=784698&group_id=7586
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Pr
Bohdan wrote:
[...]
>> There are a lot of good reasons why we would not always want to have
>> total control.
>
> "Not always" means "sometimes not" ?
> According to this logic your gui language is
> layer built on top of interface proposed by me
> ... just for convenience. Right ?
I looks like
Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 03:59 PM 8/5/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
> >
> >Why are we using such a cryptic namespace name? I mean, I can
> >understand wanting to abbreviate "template_metaprogramming", but
> >"filesystem" doesn't seem too bad and you could use "filesys"; peop
"E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sorry, you are wrong. This discussion subjects were
> the link problem and be able to to use boost::thread
> with my toy OS and/or with different threading models
> without mocking with boost sources.
Now i see. I su
Is there documentation anywhere that explains how to build and link graphviz
for MSVC .NET for use with the BOOST graph library?
I am trying to compile the example ospf-example.cpp from the BOOST graph
library in MSVC .NET. I am using BOOST 1.30.0. I built the graphviz library
using bjam with the
Peter Dimov wrote:
The main problem with shared_ptr 1.30.x and below is that the single- and
multithreaded versions are incompatible. The CVS version is now binary
compatible on Windows, so 1.31 will "work" across different threading
models; still, the correct default for Borland should probably be
Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 01:13 PM 8/5/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
>
> >On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 11:27 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
> >
> >> Alisdair Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>> version.hpp still claims to be version 1.30.0
> >>
> >> Oh well. I guess
From: "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 12:53 PM 8/6/2003, Russell Hind wrote:
>
> >Beman Dawes wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't think people were against the idea of solving the problem, but
> >> rather there is a need for a unified prefix/suffix header solution
such
>
> >> as John is suggesting
Hi all,
I've tried to use the variant library to implement some new
functionality inside the Boost.Spirit library. I must say, I'm
impressed. Very well done!
I've stumbled over a problem though: gcc (Cygwin: gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020927
(prerelease)) reports:
In file included from D:/cvs/boost/boost/
Hi John, Hi .*,
Given that I have a string 's' from somewhere, I'd like to create a
regular expression where some part must match that string. The problem
is, the 's' could contain characters that have a special meaning in
regular expressions. Is there some support function that can provide an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philippe,
could you please contact me in case you are still interested in
shifted_ptr being reviewed.
TIA
Thomas
BOOST Review Wizard.
- --
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet
Hannover
voice: +4
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
>
> BTW, I have a question:
>
> According to BCB, the primary swap is hidden when some swap is
> declared directly in std even for ADL.
> That is, not even this works:
>
> using std::swap; swap(x,y);
>
> is this conformant?
Yes, declaring things in std is undefined beh
--- Bohdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. Finally your lib may become non-template ( i mean
> cpp files) ...
If it becomes not-template, I'll stop working on it
:). cpp files are allowed for the layer 1 code and
compilation-time optimization wrappers only, that's
it! Both has little to do with
"E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --- Bohdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you mean your threads snipped: Yes i've seen it.
> > IMO it is more complicated and YES it has compile
> > time problems, unless you put traits implementation
> > in cpp fi
24 matches
Mail list logo
