[boost] [Boost-bugs] [ boost-Support Requests-795936 ] regex_matchproblem

2003-08-27 Thread SourceForge.net
Support Requests item #795936, was opened at 2003-08-27 05:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=207586&aid=795936&group_id=7586 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolut

Re: [boost] Re: Problem on the CVSversion of the top web page

2003-08-27 Thread Janusz Piwowarski
[ I replied to Daryle, but his host said: 553 5.3.0 DNSBL:You are listed at relays.osirusoft.com :( ] > Would you start with a checked-out archive of the main trunk then > apply > "update -j" with the 1.30.x branch, or use a checked-out archive of > the > 1.30.x branch and apply "update -j" w

Re: [boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread Peter Dimov
Daryle Walker wrote: > > That's an invalid argument, since the STL containers give you a default > value for the allocator argument, which makes containers work out of > the box, and the default is "for free." I'm afraid it is not. The allocator parameter has a cost. It (a) prevents some very usef

[boost] Re: Re: Boost.Regex compilation errors with BCB5

2003-08-27 Thread Chris Trengove
"John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Make sure that the console app has "Project uses the VCL" checked when you > create it. Haven't tried without it... I'm using the 5.6.4 compiler BTW. Yes, I am certainly doing this, and am also using 5.6.4 (and 5.5.1). M

[boost] Re: Problem on the CVS version of the top web page

2003-08-27 Thread David Abrahams
Daryle Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday, August 24, 2003, at 4:26 PM, David Abrahams wrote: > >> Janusz Piwowarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> On Sunday, August 24, 2003, 7:15:11 AM, Daryle Walker wrote: >>> I have a "CVS Quick Reference Card" lying around, and the entrie

[boost] Re: 1.30.0->1.30.2: no more thread support for Linux?

2003-08-27 Thread David Abrahams
Ross Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: >> Ross Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>David Abrahams wrote: >>> "Neal D. Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >You mean I can't just run bjam with no options and get the libs >built with thread support? I ne

Re: [boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread Peter Dimov
E. Gladyshev wrote: > > Sure he could have replaced the system allocator (I actually > suggested it too) but why would he want to do it? Because this saves time in the long run. Once you have a non-broken allocator you can use third party libraries as-is, without need for modification, and you can

[boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread David Abrahams
"E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > --- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Yes, I am sure. I shipped one of my libraries to a guy who >> > works on various DSP chips. The na

Re: [boost] what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread Peter Dimov
Andreas Huber wrote: > > E.g. I hope to convince some of the embedded systems/real-time crowd > to use the fsm lib I'm currently implementing. I would bet that even > in 10 years most of them wouldn't even consider using it unless they > were able to totally control how memory is allocated... That

Re: [boost] 1.30.0->1.30.2: no more thread support for Linux?

2003-08-27 Thread John Maddock
> IMHO it's not requirement to use -pthread on linux - especially when it's > not documented. I think usage of -D_REENTRANT for compiling and -lpthread > for linking should be enough. Maybe - I don't have a linux box to check on right now - doing a: g++ -dumpspecs | grep thread will tell you

Re: [boost] Re: Boost.Regex compilation errors with BCB5

2003-08-27 Thread John Maddock
> and I don't get an error. Are you using any particular compiler setting?. (I > am just creating a new Console Project in the IDE and then pasting in the > code.) Maybe there is more to this? Make sure that the console app has "Project uses the VCL" checked when you create it. Haven't tried with

Re: [boost] 1.30.0->1.30.2: no more thread support for Linux?

2003-08-27 Thread John Maddock
>You mean I can't just run bjam with no options and get the libs built with >thread support? I need to add a command-line option? > >I am updating my RPM package for 1.30.2, and I'd like to make sure this is >correct, and I will forward this to Redhat (they now have a boost rpm). The thread libs

[boost] [boost.optional && boost.variant] Why can't we allowreferences?

2003-08-27 Thread Joel de Guzman
<< pardon me if this gets re-posted >> Hi, Is there a reason why we can't allow: optional opt; Also, is there a reason why we can't allow: variant var; IIUC, internally, it's just a matter of storing a boost.reference_wrapper if T is a reference. In as much as tuple is allowed, I see

Re: [boost] Re: Spirit question...

2003-08-27 Thread Joel de Guzman
David B. Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Chris Cooney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [...] >> That was my problem - thank you. > > The moral being: > > Using anychar_p all by itself is usually a Bad Thing(TM) More accurately: Using *anychar_p or +anycha

Re: [boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread E. Gladyshev
--- Daryle Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 2:57 PM, Peter Dimov wrote: > has-bugs/is-slow/plain-old-sucks? There can be an orthogonal need for > a different allocator class, which no improvement on the default one > can fix. > > In this case, the Java user is

RE: [boost] Re: Spirit question...

2003-08-27 Thread Hartmut Kaiser
David B. Held wrote: > The moral being: > > Using anychar_p all by itself is usually a Bad Thing(TM) > > That's because it's like the langoliers--it eats everything > up. You usually want to say what it shouldn't eat up by > subtracting the terminating character from the parser. I > thin

[boost] Re: [bgl] typo in adjacency_list_io.hpp

2003-08-27 Thread Vladimir Prus
Hi Janusz, Janusz Piwowarski wrote: > Hi all > > gcc 3.2 generates warnings about implicit typename in line 313 in file > adjacency_list_io.hpp. I think either there should be EdgePrinter > call or class G should be renamed to Graph, as is in the rest of > templates in this file. Thanks for poi

[boost] Re: [BGL] vector_as_graph::remove_vertex proposal

2003-08-27 Thread Vladimir Prus
Hi Janusz, Janusz Piwowarski wrote: > I found remove_vertex member for vector_as_graph isn't implemented. > It's my proposal: Thanks! > template > void > remove_vertex(typename EdgeList::value_type u, > std::vector& g) > { > typedef typename EdgeList::iterator iterat

[boost] Re: Spirit question...

2003-08-27 Thread David B. Held
"Chris Cooney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [...] > That was my problem - thank you. The moral being: Using anychar_p all by itself is usually a Bad Thing(TM) That's because it's like the langoliers--it eats everything up. You usually want to say what it shou

[boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread Daryle Walker
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 2:57 PM, Peter Dimov wrote: E. Gladyshev wrote: --- Peter Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In this context, an allocator parameter is only an excuse for implementors to avoid doing the necessary work to make function<> useful out of the box. "You can always use a

[boost] Re: Problem on the CVS version of the top web page

2003-08-27 Thread Daryle Walker
On Sunday, August 24, 2003, at 4:26 PM, David Abrahams wrote: Janusz Piwowarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Sunday, August 24, 2003, 7:15:11 AM, Daryle Walker wrote: I have a "CVS Quick Reference Card" lying around, and the entries for "checkout" and "update" have a sub-option "-j REV" that

[boost] Re: Problem on the CVS version of the top web page

2003-08-27 Thread Daryle Walker
On Sunday, August 24, 2003, at 6:49 PM, Janusz Piwowarski wrote: On Sunday, August 24, 2003, 7:15:11 AM, Daryle Walker wrote: I have a "CVS Quick Reference Card" lying around, and the entries for "checkout" and "update" have a sub-option "-j REV" that says "Merge in changes". That can't fuse o

[boost] Re: 1.30.0->1.30.2: no more thread support for Linux?

2003-08-27 Thread Steve Hutton
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Abrahams wrote: > "Neal D. Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Saturday 23 August 2003 07:18 am, John Maddock wrote: >>> > One more thing: what exactly can go wrong with 1.30.0 if >>> > -pthread isn't used? Is it boost specific or a general thing >>> >

[boost] Re: 1.30.0->1.30.2: no more thread support for Linux?

2003-08-27 Thread Ross Smith
David Abrahams wrote: Ross Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David Abrahams wrote: "Neal D. Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: You mean I can't just run bjam with no options and get the libs built with thread support? I need to add a command-line option? The libraries that require thread suppo

Re: [boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread E. Gladyshev
--- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > --- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, I am sure. I shipped one of my libraries to a guy who > > works on various DSP chips. The native memory allocator > > on one of the DSP was ver

RE: [boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread Glen Knowles
Title: RE: [boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost? --- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Are you sure that >> there's no good general-purpose allocator which they can use? > >Yes, I am sure. I shipped one of my libraries to a

RE: [boost] Re: Re: [uBlas] Any Performance Resulst Data with uBlas?

2003-08-27 Thread Hurd, Matthew
> From: Firingme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Where is uBlas-dev list ??? > I can't find it It is a yahoo groups thingo at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ublas-dev/ Check out http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Effective_UBL AS too. Cheers, Matt.

RE: [boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread Darryl Green
> -Original Message- > From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I am afraid that some of the boost libraries (as they are now) won't > > work for a big group of real time and embedded developers, where > > customization is the key. >

[boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread David Abrahams
"E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > I am afraid that some of the boost libraries (as they are now) won't >> > work for a big group of real time and embedded developers, where >> > customiz

[boost] Re: Re: [uBlas] Any Performance Resulst Data with uBlas?

2003-08-27 Thread Firingme
"Hurd, Matthew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > > From: Firingme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [boost] Re: [uBlas] Any Performance Resulst Data with uBlas? > > > > > > Then Matthew, refer to your graph result data, the champion > > and the ru

Re: [boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread E. Gladyshev
--- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I am afraid that some of the boost libraries (as they are now) won't > > work for a big group of real time and embedded developers, where > > customization is the key. > > Is it really (other than cu

Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread E. Gladyshev
--- "E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Peter Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > E. Gladyshev wrote: > > > --- Peter Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> unless there are very solid reasons for the allocator parameter. ;-) > > > > > > I agree, but the problme is that I do

RE: [boost] Re: [uBlas] Any Performance Resulst Data with uBlas?

2003-08-27 Thread Hurd, Matthew
> -Original Message- > From: Firingme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [boost] Re: [uBlas] Any Performance Resulst Data with uBlas? > > > Then Matthew, refer to your graph result data, the champion > and the runner-up all are C libs but not C++ > .. Does it means

[boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread David Abrahams
"E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am afraid that some of the boost libraries (as they are now) won't > work for a big group of real time and embedded developers, where > customization is the key. Is it really (other than culturally, I mean)? Are you sure that there's no good general

Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread E. Gladyshev
--- "E. Gladyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Peter Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > E. Gladyshev wrote: > > > --- Peter Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> unless there are very solid reasons for the allocator parameter. ;-) > > > > > > I agree, but the problme is that I do

Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

2003-08-27 Thread E. Gladyshev
--- Peter Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > E. Gladyshev wrote: > > --- Peter Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> unless there are very solid reasons for the allocator parameter. ;-) > > > > I agree, but the problme is that I don't know whether I have a solid > reason or not. > > I have to

[boost] Re: [uBlas] Any Performance Resulst Data with uBlas?

2003-08-27 Thread Firingme
Then Matthew, refer to your graph result data, the champion and the runner-up all are C libs but not C++ .. Does it means if I want to get high performance with Matrix operation, I "must" use C but not C++ ___ Unsubscribe & other c

RE: [boost] Re: 1.30.0->1.30.2: no more thread support for Linux?

2003-08-27 Thread Chris Cooney
Zing! /* * Chris Cooney * Ventana Group * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * (530)846-6640 x201 **/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not

[boost] Re: Boost.Regex compilation errors with BCB5

2003-08-27 Thread Chris Trengove
"John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I can reproduce this with just: > > #include > #include > > No boost code necessary :-( > > Even worse this reproduces the error as well: > > #include > #pragma hdrstop > > enum enum_t > { >one = 1, >two = 2 > }