- Original Message -
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:06 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: File missing from Boost 1.30.1 release?
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zak Kipling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just tried
- Original Message -
From: Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: ublas and gcc (was: Re: [boost] Re: Compiler status for GCC
3.3)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Walter) writes:
[...]
| This whole
- Original Message -
From: Martin Wille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Support for gcc-2.95 in 1.31
[...]
a couple of libraries are regressing for gcc-2.95.3/Linux:
[...]
numeric/ublas
Hi Daniel,
you wrote:
[snip]
That's probably wrong. They should use a tracker first and then discuss
them
on the mailing lists.
I disagree. I think that we should try to focus information instead of
spreading them around.
That's exactly what a tracker is good for IMHO.
If we use the
Hi Beman,
you wrote:
* Monitor regression tests to verify that errors are dealt with.
Unsure about that. ublas has some test failures (for ICC on windows for
example) which nobody is going to fix probably. OTOH this is the only
verification if cvs is consistent.
The actual process
- Original Message -
From: Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 5:43 PM
Subject: [boost] Release Manager's Checklist added
I've added a detailed Release Manager's Checklist
(boost-root/more/release_mgr_checklist.html).
- Original Message -
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 11:58 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Release Manager's Checklist added
[...]
That's probably wrong. They should use a tracker first and then
discuss
them on the mailing
Hi Gabriel,
you wrote:
| On the other hand if your native compiler is GCC and your system
was
| not configured with that setting, then you may get into trouble --
| since you'll be mixing translation units with different ABIs.
|
| Furthermore, that sounds like a workaround. Isn't
- Original Message -
From: Kirill Lapshin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:59 AM
Subject: [boost] Re: uBlas and linear algebra questions
David Abrahams wrote:
Ah, I understand. It seems as though the choices for linear algebra
in C++ haven't
- Original Message -
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:25 AM
Subject: [boost] Re: uBlas and linear algebra questions
Kirill Lapshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
I'm trying to get a grip on what facilities
- Original Message -
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:51 AM
Subject: [boost] Re: uBlas and linear algebra questions
Kirill Lapshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Ah, I understand. It seems as though the
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Frey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:38 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: plans for a bugfix release ?
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:26:43 +0200, David Abrahams wrote:
What does everybody think about
- Original Message -
From: Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Compiler status for GCC 3.3
[...]
| I'm not sure about this. Paul C. Leopardi and Guillaume Melquiond
already
| reported
- Original Message -
From: Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 3:55 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Compiler status for GCC 3.3
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| But some of the problems are clearly GCC bugs.
Hi Alexey,
you wrote:
Please correct this who can:
408c408
#ifdef BOOST_UBLAS_NO_NESTED_CLASS_RELATION
---
#ifdef BOOST_UBLAS_MSVC_NESTED_CLASS_RELATION
[snip a couple of similar corrections]
Will do.
Thanks for your feedback,
Joerg
___
Hi Johan,
you wrote:
Thanks for all your info. I've run the tests with a Boost from CVS (from
january 31st), compressed_matrix and axpy_prod, and the results give
roughly the same speed as our implementation, and ca. 30% better memory
efficiency. Great!
Kudos to the guys on
Hi Johan,
you wrote:
[snip]
Let's look at just assembly for now. We start by creating an 1e5 x 1e5
sparse matrix. We then successively insert 1e5 elements in the diagonal.
What happens is that the insertion speed is linear for the first ~5
elements, and then grinds to a halt. The
Hi Julius,
you wrote:
[snip]
IIRC the signatures 'float abs(float)' and 'double abs(double)' should
be
part of cmath, which is included in ublas/traits.hpp.
I think they should, too, but they aren't. I don't know why, but the
Standard (Table 81,
Section, 26.5, p596) puts abs, div, rand
Hi Michael (hi Kresimir, hi Julius, hi all ;-),
you wrote:
I have come across this problem before. The same problem occured when I
was working on .NET patches for boost::quaternion.
So there's at least another boost library affected.
The following is from memory of VC7, so actual names may
- Original Message -
From: Andrei Alexandrescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 8:44 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Array support [was SmartPtr
(Loki) -auto_ptr/movec'torissue]
Howard Hinnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL
to work due to our
migration to MPL (thanks, Aleksey!). The last compiler which doesn't support
these constructs is Borland.
Joerg Walter wrote:
The following code compiles successfully with GCC 3.2.1:
#include boost/numeric/ublas/matrix.hpp
using namespace boost::numeric;
typedef ublas
Hi Julius,
you wrote:
now that sparse matrix_row's works with Joerg's latest CVS upload (thanks
Joerg), a const parameter that used to work with 1_29_0 doesn't anymore:
Ouch ;-(
using namespace boost::numeric;
typedef ublas::matrixdouble TM;
double InnerProdConst( const TM A, const
Hi Paul,
you wrote:
I've again tried to compile this with GCC 3.2.1. Here are the
diagnostics:
In file included from test_circle_area.cpp:12:
function_constants.hpp:83: uninitialized const `
boost::math::float_constants::pi
The following workaround (applied to all constants)
Hi Paul,
you wrote:
I've been looking into an earlier version of the proposed math constants
before and asked myself how to implement a generic function like
templateclass T
T circle_area (const T radius) {
return math_constantsT::pi * radius * radius;
}
How should this be
- Original Message -
From: Paul A. Bristow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:23 AM
Subject: RE: [boost] Interval library merge
I agree with this - intervals seem more numeric to me - though where that
leaves
constants
- Original Message -
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: boost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:27 PM
Subject: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions for compiler vendors
Hi,
I'm trying to come up with instructions for compiler vendors who want
to use
- Original Message -
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] Testing instructions for compiler vendors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Walter) writes:
1. Should we do
- Original Message -
From: Stas Fomin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 6:57 PM
Subject: [boost] UBLAS: preserving matrix resize.
I have to make matrix resize with preserving of the content of the matrix.
(add rows, columns...)
I try to do
- Original Message -
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Boost mailing list' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:57 AM
Subject: RE: [boost] ublas regression test problems
Joerg Walter wrote:
OK. The mpl::if_ problem vanished, the remaining problems
29 matches
Mail list logo
