Re: [boost] solaris, once again

2003-03-06 Thread Mark Rodgers
From: Marc Borgers [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am having problems with the shared_ptr on Forte 6.2: when I compile my code into an application, it all seems to work. When I am compiling a static library, I had to compile it with the -misalign option. Interesting. I haven't got as far as running

Re: [boost] solaris, once again

2003-03-05 Thread Mark Rodgers
- Original Message - From: Garnet Kin-Lic Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] there have been a few discussions recently about the status of solaris and boost. as someone whose code relies on the boost::function and boost::bind libraries, and who needs to port to solaris in the very near future,

Re: [boost] 1.30.0 branch-for-release complete

2003-03-03 Thread Mark Rodgers
Is it time we introduced beta releases into the release procedure? It seems to me that it would be a good idea to tar up 1.30.0 RC and give everyone a chance to try it out and report feedback without having to use CVS. I know CVS puts me off. Questions include How much of a hassle would it

Re: [boost] Proposed Boost config macro

2002-12-07 Thread Mark Rodgers
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If this fails to compile, we may need to add a dummy return 0; at the end. I know of two compilers which act this way: Metrowerks and HP. What do you want to call it? I'm not happy with it, but...