Hi,
I have a small patch to is_convertible.hpp that will allow a version of
KCC (__EDG_VERSION__ == 243) to use the *almost* ideal implementation of
is_convertible. The current design only uses the ideal implementation for
__EDG_VERSION__ = 245, and the current choice fails to compile for me.
David Abrahams wrote:
I don't understand it, but Ron Garcia seems to have a fondness for
checking duplicates of information that is hosted elsewhere into his
library's tree.
Since you and I previously discussed why multi_array has a private
copy of iterator_adaptors, I'm assuming a :-) goes
On Wed, 14 May 2003, Lucas Galfaso wrote:
Hi everyone,
is anyone considering the addition of an arbitrary precision number library?
In short, yes.
Several C++ implementations of arbitrary magnitude integers (bignums or
bigints) are laying around Boost, but none have been proposed for
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
At 07:11 AM 3/12/2003, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Markus Schöpflin wrote:
currently the constructors test of the multi array library fails for
VACPP6. This is due to the fact that the test uses an unsigned int
where
a size_type should be
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Eric Friedman wrote:
Ronald Garcia wrote:
In addition, compiling with Intel C++ 7.0 under strict ansi compliance
(-ansi) revealed the following nits as well:
[snip]
I've enclosed patches (unified diffs) for these.
Are any of these errors severe, hindering you
Hi,
I have been testing out some example programs from the variant tutorial.
First, I ran across some errors in the code shown in the documentation
for the first variant program.
(From GCC 2.95.2)
ex1.cpp:17: `which' undeclared (first use this function)
ex1.cpp:48: `a_printer' undeclared (first
Hi,
In reading through the variant docs, I noticed a requirement that at least
two types must be supported by the variant. Is this meant for ease of
library implementation, or is this a means of protecting programmers from
themselves? :-)
It may not make sense for a human programmer to
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Dave Abrahams wrote:
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:26 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Ronald Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Dave Abrahams wrote:
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Ronald Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 5
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Dave Abrahams wrote:
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Ronald Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Rene Rivera wrote:
[2003-02-05] Ronald Garcia wrote:
I would like to request the addition of the -ansi flag
Howdy,
I'm trying to use boost build with the intel c++ compiler under linux.
My compiler is installed in /usr/local/intel, but boost build appears to
be looking for it in /opt/intel. Is there a way to specify the compiler
location as an option to boost build? According to the docs, the only
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Rene Rivera wrote:
[2003-01-27] Ronald Garcia wrote:
Howdy,
I'm trying to use boost build with the intel c++ compiler under linux.
My compiler is installed in /usr/local/intel, but boost build appears to
be looking for it in /opt/intel. Is there a way
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Roland Richter wrote:
In multi_array's reference manual, Table 2,
the three links in the sentence
Otherwise it models _Random Access Traversal Iterator_,
_Readable Iterator_, and _Writable Iterator_.
seem to be broken.
Thanks for the note. Those links refer to
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Ronald Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a way to get this to work without previously running the entire
boost test suite? I just want to test one library.
For testing one library, forget about report generation.
Just go to status
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Could you test if the following compiles successfully with the latest CVS
sources?
[...]
The code you posted compiles under KCC both with and without the --strict
command-line parameter. Hope this helps, and thank you.
Cheers,
ron
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Ronald Garcia wrote:
Howdy. I am trying to use KCC in strict mode to compile some
code that depends on type traits.
Which version? Does it support partial template specialization/template
template parameters?
Here's the version blurb
IIRC, the array_traits library was pulled off of the boost main page
and moved into the sandbox a while ago. What is its current status? Is
being actively developed or is it currently in stasis?
cheers,
ron
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
Helmut Zeisel submitted an unlimited integer library 3 July 2001,
big_int_20010821.zip
and more recently Roland Garcia submitted bigint.zip, which works to compute
factorial
using MCVS 7.0 with trivial changes.
big integers are an important
17 matches
Mail list logo
