On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:26 PM [GMT+1=CET], > Ronald Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Dave Abrahams wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 PM [GMT+1=CET], > > > Ronald Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Rene Rivera wrote: > > > > > > > > > [2003-02-05] Ronald Garcia wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to request the addition of the -ansi flag to the > > > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > I think that if all the flag does is to cause errors on incorrect code, we > should just add it and forget about options. However, if it disables > certain language extensions like long long that are not likely to be used > unintentionally, we should think twice. > It looks like the intel compiler still supports long long when used with the -ansi option. I searched around for good specs, but could find no definitive outline of what other restrictions it adds. So at least as far as long long is concerned, it's good to go. Cheers, ron _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
