Isadora Kenterly wrote:
I posted this question to one of the C++ groups and they
treated me as if I were an entity from another planet!
The group was comp.lang.c++.
The topic there is standard C++ so libraries like boost are off topic
If they are in a good mood they'll help but there is no
What I did was to provide a *thin* wrapper around the internal C strucs
used by libxml2, so every dom manipulation call can be delegated down to
libxml2. For example xpath lookup: I call libxml2's xpath API, returning
me a C structure (possibly) holding a node set, i.e. a list of C
nodes. I just
Justin M. Lewis wrote:
Not entirely, passing a pointer doesn't tell you that the parameter will
change, it just tells you that it might, it still leaves you in the position
of having to track down the function and check it. But outside of that, if
you're like me, at this point you prefer
Joel de Guzman wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I was talking to you on the boost newsgroup about spirit being slow to compile
Here is a standalone section of code, it'll compile but you can't do anything with it
The compile takes about 15 mins on my machine
Joel de Guzman wrote:
Vincent Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
I assume this is the right place to post questions on Spirit now that it
is part of boost!
If not here, where?
There's a Spirit specific mailing list that
Hi,
I assume this is the right place to post questions on Spirit now that it
is part of boost!
If not here, where?
My question is about compile speed.
Is there any way to speed it up or at least seperate it from the project?
I have added 2 parsers to my code base and the compile time (VC6) has
Hi,
A thought occurred to me about optional
This is again about having the constructor non-explicit
(I would really like to have this :-)
could you use partial specialization to do this ?
The code below has the desired behaviour.
usage gives the programmer the ability to choose whether the
Hi,
I have one comment and one question.
So first the comment
I was recently thinking about a similar thing for a slightly different
purpose. You seem to concentrate on option return values, what about
optional arguments.
e.g.
void fn(int iImportant, optionalint iNotImportant =
Forwarded to main Boost list - that's the more appropriate venue for
discussions of possible additions.
-- Jim Hyslop boost-users moderator.
-Original Message-
From: alexei_novakov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
