Thanks for your reply.
I've created my own vcproj (VC++ 7.1 project) for building the libs that I
need,
and I've used the /MD flag which is the "multithread- and DLL-specific
versions" flag (used also for my application),
which means that everything is fine, right
Hi,
I haven't followed this thread completely, but I have a question.
I'm working on Win 2k, and I'm using VC++ 7.1. Building
boost with this toolset, do I need to specify something to make it
thread-safe?
TIA,
Viv
- Original Message -
From: "John Maddock" <[
It was a long thread about this issue ... Look in
archive for the
subject "Thread Lib and DLL" arround the date:
3/30/2003
- Original Message -
From:
Martin Bosticky
To: boost
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 2:29 AM
Subject: [boost] DLL hell
Hello everybody,
I j
: [boost] Threads and msvc 7
> William E. Kempf wrote:
>
> >JOLY Loic said:
> >
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>I am currently trying to use the Boost.Threads library on windows (VC++
> >>7.0 and 7.1 compilers), and I wonder about some points :
> &
Hi all,
This discussion was a long time ago, but I didn't get the end of it.
As building the thread library I get a lot of warnings I would like
to remove them somehow (I'm using the 1.30 release version).
So, what would you suggest? Using pragma's is safe enough?
If yes, where is the best place
I haven't tried but it should work ...
By default the bjam will build this dll using the /MD flag (runtime-library
flag).
If you look in MSDNL you will see that this flag reuqest: "The actual
working code is
contained in MSVCRT.dll, which must be available at run time".
What you could do, is to bu
Thanks a lot for the answer! This is what I wanted to know: If I can build
the boost.thread dll
and the app with the /MT flag instead of /MD flag.
Regarding the mixing of the RTLs the last versions of VC++ gives you a link
warning if you try
to do that ...
Thanks again,
Viv
>
> --
> Willi
- Original Message -
From: "William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> vc said:
> >> As for the warnings themselves... I'm still doing more research just
> >> to be 100% sure, but everything I've found thus far indicates you can
> >
- Original Message -
From: "William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> vc said:
> > As I am having the same problem, I looked a little to the bjam settings,
> > and it seems that, at least when building with VC7.x, the -Wx (warning
> > level) opt
As I am having the same problem, I looked a little to the bjam settings,
and it seems that, at least when building with VC7.x, the -Wx (warning
level) option is
not set, that is why probably with bjam these warnings are not seen ...
Viv
- Original Message -
From: "William E. Kempf" <[EMAI
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] boost 1.30 - Thread lib workspace
>
> vc said:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm using the boost version 1.30 release, on Win2k and the VC7.1
> > compile
Hi all,
I'm using the boost version 1.30 release, on Win2k and the VC7.1 compiler.
I'm porting a big application from Unix to Windows. Because for all the
modules within this app I created
a VC++ workspace I would like to do the same for the thread library from
boost.
For this
I just reported it.
Viv
- Original Message -
From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Boost mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] When will be the next boost release
Hi all,
I am using the VS .NET 2003 (VC7.1) on Windows 2000 and I'm porting
a Linux application on Windows. I got the BETA sources
(http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/boost_1_30_0_b1.zip)
and I give it a try, but the compiler stops with the "Buffer overrun
detected!" error (see Vccrash.j
d Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Boost mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] When will be the next boost released?
> "vc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > --
- Original Message -
From: "Joel de Guzman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Boost mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] When will be the next boost released?
> vc wrote:
&
Hi all,
I have to port a Linux application that is using spirit on the VS. NET 2003.
Unfortunately
the current release of the spirit is crashing the VC++ 2003 compiler, so I
asked the spirit
guys when the next version (1.5.2) will be released.
Their answer was that the next version will be
This is really cool ... I think that this line should be added
to the "Welcome to the "Boost" mailing list" email so everybody
to be aware of it ;)
- Original Message -
From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Boost mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 7
?
Also in the nondet_random_speed.cpp the creation of
the object of type boost::random_device
is created only when it is about
Linux.
So my question is: Using VC++ 7.0 on Win2k am I
able to use the boost::random_device class?
Thanks a lot in advance,
coco
19 matches
Mail list logo
