> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Reece Dunn
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 12:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [boost] (no subject)
Thanks for repackaging the code inside zip, and for mor examples, and
making
Paul A Bristow wrote:
This is quite neat, and works for me using MSVC 7.0 but:
Thanks. Comments always welcome.
1 The layout is screwed up by the mail attachment process and requires some
editing to avoid compile errors.
I have zipped the file. This should prevent the layout being modified by the
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Ford
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [boost] (no subject)
>
>
> I decided that I needed
I decided that I needed a workable units library, so I wrote one. It
allows for weakly typed dimensioned quantities (so a length divided by
a time is automatically converted to a velocity). It also allows
users to use strong typeing for quantities of the same dimension which
shouldn't be confused
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:17:28 +0100
From: Hubert Holin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [boost] Re: Any interest in a stats class
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Precedence: list
Message: 3
Somewhere in the E.U., le 25/02/2003
Bonjour
> From: "William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/01/02 Thu PM 08:16:44 EST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [boost] (no subject)
>
> Sorry for this off topic, personal e-mail.
>
> Beman, I've been trying to respond to your last e-mail me
Sorry for this off topic, personal e-mail.
Beman, I've been trying to respond to your last e-mail message, and every attempt
get's bounced with an error message from your e-mail relay program. Is there another
e-mail address I can send to, or do you have any idea why I can no longer contact you
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:35:36 +0100 Wesley W. Terpstra
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [On unnecessary copies]
> I think you may be interested to run this program:
It's a demonstration of the Return Value Optimisation, which I was already
aware of. The RVO is explici
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 07:09:00PM +, Dave Harris wrote:
> The benefit is encapsulated single-step construction without unnecessary
> copying. As far I can tell, you have in mind either:
>
> MyMember member1, member2;
> ar >> member1 >> member2;
> const MyClass mine( member1, memb
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:19:01 -0800 Robert Ramey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >const T t(ar);
>
> > It seems to me that your versioning infrastructure doesn't
> > support this.
>
> It doesn't. It conflicted with version and added no known benefit.
The bene
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:49 + (GMT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Harris)
>> "Serialization Overrides" explains this and gives a code excerpt
>> showing what one has to do to use a constructor with arguments.
>The code looks roughly like:
>ar >> a;
> t = new T(a);
>ar
11 matches
Mail list logo
